These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
410 related items for PubMed ID: 17478011
1. Enhanced and bilateralized visual sensory processing in the ventral stream may be a feature of normal aging. De Sanctis P, Katz R, Wylie GR, Sehatpour P, Alexopoulos GS, Foxe JJ. Neurobiol Aging; 2008 Oct; 29(10):1576-86. PubMed ID: 17478011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhanced adaptation of visual cortical cells to visual stimulation in aged cats. Hua T, Li G, Tang C, Wang Z, Chang S. Neurosci Lett; 2009 Feb 13; 451(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 19121368 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in early sensory-perceptual processing in synesthesia: a visual evoked potential study. Barnett KJ, Foxe JJ, Molholm S, Kelly SP, Shalgi S, Mitchell KJ, Newell FN. Neuroimage; 2008 Nov 15; 43(3):605-13. PubMed ID: 18723094 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural representations of visual words and objects: a functional MRI study on the modularity of reading and object processing. Borowsky R, Esopenko C, Cummine J, Sarty GE. Brain Topogr; 2007 Jun 02; 20(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17929158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical activation in hemianopia after stroke. Nelles G, de Greiff A, Pscherer A, Forsting M, Gerhard H, Esser J, Diener HC. Neurosci Lett; 2007 Oct 09; 426(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 17881128 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf. Finney EM, Fine I, Dobkins KR. Nat Neurosci; 2001 Dec 09; 4(12):1171-3. PubMed ID: 11704763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Gauthier I, Curran T, Curby KM, Collins D. Nat Neurosci; 2003 Apr 09; 6(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 12627167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Independent processing of visual stimulus changes in ventral and dorsal stream features indexed by an early positive difference in event-related brain potentials. Kimura M, Katayama J, Murohashi H. Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Feb 09; 59(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 15978688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Aging effect in pattern, motion and cognitive visual evoked potentials. Kuba M, Kremláček J, Langrová J, Kubová Z, Szanyi J, Vít F. Vision Res; 2012 Jun 01; 62():9-16. PubMed ID: 22503557 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Appearing and disappearing stimuli trigger a reflexive modulation of visual cortical activity. Hopfinger JB, Maxwell JS. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep 01; 25(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15907377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter-individual differences in the polarity of early visual responses and attention effects. Proverbio AM, Del Zotto M, Zani A. Neurosci Lett; 2007 May 29; 419(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 17490815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Selective visual responses to expansion and rotation in the human MT complex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation. Wall MB, Lingnau A, Ashida H, Smith AT. Eur J Neurosci; 2008 May 29; 27(10):2747-57. PubMed ID: 18547254 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Human visual processing as revealed by magnetoencephalography. Kaneoke Y, Watanabe S, Kakigi R. Int Rev Neurobiol; 2005 May 29; 68():197-222. PubMed ID: 16443015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Age differences in target detection and interference resolution in working memory: an event-related potential study. Tays WJ, Dywan J, Mathewson KJ, Segalowitz SJ. J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec 29; 20(12):2250-62. PubMed ID: 18457511 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural basis of redundancy effects in visual object categorization. Reinholz J, Pollmann S. Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jan 29; 412(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 17123724 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Motion-onset VEPs reflect long maturation and early aging of visual motion-processing system. Langrová J, Kuba M, Kremlácek J, Kubová Z, Vít F. Vision Res; 2006 Feb 29; 46(4):536-44. PubMed ID: 16083936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG. Itier RJ, Herdman AT, George N, Cheyne D, Taylor MJ. Brain Res; 2006 Oct 18; 1115(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 16930564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. VERP and brain imaging for identifying levels of visual dorsal and ventral stream function in typical and preterm infants. Braddick O, Atkinson J, Wattam-Bell J. Prog Brain Res; 2011 Oct 18; 189():95-111. PubMed ID: 21489385 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic brain activation patterns for face recognition: a magnetoencephalography study. Lee D, Simos P, Sawrie SM, Martin RC, Knowlton RC. Brain Topogr; 2005 Oct 18; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 16193263 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]