These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

383 related items for PubMed ID: 17478280

  • 1. The evaluation of articular cartilage lesions of the knee with a 3-Tesla magnet.
    von Engelhardt LV, Kraft CN, Pennekamp PH, Schild HH, Schmitz A, von Falkenhausen M.
    Arthroscopy; 2007 May; 23(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 17478280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of patellar chondromalacia with MR: comparison between T2-weighted FSE SPIR and GE MTC.
    Macarini L, Perrone A, Murrone M, Marini S, Stefanelli M.
    Radiol Med; 2004 Sep; 108(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 15343130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
    Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, Zarlingo M, Feller JF, Bost FW, Belzer JP, Wischer TK, Genant HK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. MR in the study of knee cartilage pathologies: influence of location and grade on the effectiveness of the method.
    Macarini L, Murrone M, Marini S, Mariano M, Zaccheo N, Moretti B.
    Radiol Med; 2003 Apr; 105(4):296-307. PubMed ID: 12835623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Patellar cartilage lesions: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and T2 relaxation-time mapping.
    Hannila I, Nieminen MT, Rauvala E, Tervonen O, Ojala R.
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 17453527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Knee chondral lesions: incidence and correlation between arthroscopic and magnetic resonance findings.
    Figueroa D, Calvo R, Vaisman A, Carrasco MA, Moraga C, Delgado I.
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Mar; 23(3):312-5. PubMed ID: 17349476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Disler DG, McCauley TR, Wirth CR, Fuchs MD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [The initial (I and II) and advanced (III and IV) stages of juvenile patellar chondromalacia. Its diagnosis by magnetic resonance using a 1.5-T magnet with FLASH sequences].
    Macarini L, Rizzo A, Martino F, Zaccheo N, Angelelli G, Rotondo A.
    Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 9717534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. In vivo biochemical 7.0 Tesla magnetic resonance: preliminary results of dGEMRIC, zonal T2, and T2* mapping of articular cartilage.
    Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Hughes T, Zilkens C, Quirbach S, Scheffler K, Kraff O, Schweitzer ME, Szomolanyi P, Trattnig S.
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):619-26. PubMed ID: 18708855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Study of femoro-tibial cartilage diseases with MRI].
    Colin T, Provost N, Beguin J, Loyau G.
    Rev Rhum Ed Fr; 1994 May; 61(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 7812286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Comparison of different MRT techniques in the diagnosis of degenerative cartilage diseases. In vitro study of 50 joint specimens of the knee at T1.5].
    Bachmann G, Heinrichs C, Jürgensen I, Rominger M, Scheiter A, Rau WS.
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 9198516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
    Li XM, Peng WJ, Wu H, Kacher D, Xia LM, Ai F, Li F, Xiong W.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov 05; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [MRI of the hyaline knee joint cartilages. Animal and clinical studies].
    Adam G, Prescher A, Nolte-Ernsting C, Bühne M, Scherer K, Küpper W, Günther RW.
    Rofo; 1994 Feb 05; 160(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 8312511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Sensitivity of routine 1.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy as gold standard in fresh traumatic chondral lesions of the knee in young adults.
    Kuikka PI, Kiuru MJ, Niva MH, Kröger H, Pihlajamäki HK.
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Oct 05; 22(10):1033-9. PubMed ID: 17027399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Hargreaves BA, Steines D, Genovese M, Dillingham MF, Winalski CS, Lang P.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov 05; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH, Zak L, Mamisch TC, Resinger C, Marlovits S, Trattnig S.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep 05; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression.
    Sonin AH, Pensy RA, Mulligan ME, Hatem S.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov 05; 179(5):1159-66. PubMed ID: 12388492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Direct MR arthrography of the wrist in comparison with arthroscopy: a prospective study on 125 patients].
    Schmitt R, Christopoulos G, Meier R, Coblenz G, Fröhner S, Lanz U, Krimmer H.
    Rofo; 2003 Jul 05; 175(7):911-9. PubMed ID: 12847645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
    Li X, Yu C, Wu H, Daniel K, Hu D, Xia L, Pan C, Xu A, Hu J, Wang L, Peng W, Li F.
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct 05; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
    Lee SY, Jee WH, Kim SK, Koh IJ, Kim JM.
    Acta Radiol; 2010 May 05; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.