These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


732 related items for PubMed ID: 17481761

  • 1. Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs.
    Brown CR, Clarke AR, Barry RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 17481761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. ERPs to infrequent auditory stimuli in two- and three-stimulus versions of the inter-modal oddball task.
    Brown CR, Barry RJ, Clarke AR.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 19733601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Inter-modal attention: ERPs to auditory targets in an inter-modal oddball task.
    Brown CR, Clarke AR, Barry RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 16529831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Event-related potentials in adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: an investigation using an inter-modal auditory/visual oddball task.
    Barry RJ, Clarke AR, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M, Brown CR, Heaven PC.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Feb; 71(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 19022305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. EEG spectral dynamics during discrimination of auditory and visual targets.
    Mazaheri A, Picton TW.
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 15922161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 17; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of task difficulty on the features of event-related potential during visual oddball task.
    Kim KH, Kim JH, Yoon J, Jung KY.
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov 14; 445(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 18790010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. With long intervals, inter-stimulus interval is the critical determinant of the human P300 amplitude.
    Sambeth A, Maes JH, Brankack J.
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Apr 15; 359(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 15050684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Gender-specific development of auditory information processing in children: an ERP study.
    Nanova P, Lyamova L, Hadjigeorgieva M, Kolev V, Yordanova J.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep 15; 119(9):1992-2003. PubMed ID: 18579438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL, Röder B.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb 15; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.
    Sawaki R, Katayama J.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov 15; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
    Barry RJ, Rushby JA, Smith JL, Clarke AR, Croft RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep 15; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ, Cao KL, Wei CG, Liu YZ.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec 05; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Auditory and visual P300 reflecting cognitive improvement in patients with schizophrenia with quetiapine: a pilot study.
    Park EJ, Han SI, Jeon YW.
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2010 May 30; 34(4):674-80. PubMed ID: 20304022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects.
    Hagen GF, Gatherwright JR, Lopez BA, Polich J.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan 30; 59(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 16253363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks.
    Kayser J, Tenke CE.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb 30; 117(2):348-68. PubMed ID: 16356767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A, Macdonald M, Schröger E, Sculthorpe L, Campbell K.
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep 19; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.