These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

173 related items for PubMed ID: 17483491

  • 1. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening.
    Spayne J, Ackerman I, Milosevic M, Seidenfeld A, Covens A, Paszat L.
    Eur J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 18(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 17483491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B, Kemetli L, Sparén P, Silfverdal L, Strander B, Ryd W, Dillner J, Törnberg S.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May 07; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
    Stuart GC, McGregor SE, Duggan MA, Nation JG.
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep 01; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pap smear screening history of women with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
    Pak SC, Martens M, Bekkers R, Crandon AJ, Land R, Nicklin JL, Perrin LC, Obermair A.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Dec 01; 47(6):504-7. PubMed ID: 17991118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical and cost implications of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: the impact of test sensitivity.
    Hutchinson ML, Berger BM, Farber FL.
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul 01; 6(7):766-80. PubMed ID: 11067374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An audit of the cervical cancer screening histories of 246 women with carcinoma.
    Duggan MA, Nation J.
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2012 Jul 01; 16(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 22297213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Sentinel Pap smears in 261 invasive cervical cancer patients in Italy.
    Igidbashian S, Maggioni A, Casadio C, Boveri S, Cristoforoni P, Sideri M.
    Vaccine; 2009 May 29; 27 Suppl 1():A34-8. PubMed ID: 19480959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Is cytologic screening an effective surveillance method for detection of vaginal recurrence of uterine cancer?
    Cooper AL, Dornfeld-Finke JM, Banks HW, Davey DD, Modesitt SC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan 29; 107(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 16394042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Participation in highly subsidized cervical cancer screening by women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.
    Obi SN, Ozumba BC, Nwokocha AR, Waboso PA.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr 29; 27(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17464818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.