These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

904 related items for PubMed ID: 17485989

  • 1. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
    Kasturi K, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Hu Y, Loizou PC, Li N, Kasturi K.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA, Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Labadie RF.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS, Allen SL.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ, Skinner MW, Martin LF, Holden LK, Galvin KL, Holden TA, Whitford L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Companding to improve cochlear-implant speech recognition in speech-shaped noise.
    Bhattacharya A, Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1079-89. PubMed ID: 17672655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J.
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K, Killion MC, Christensen LA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A, Van Deun L, Eftaxiadis K, Laneau J, Moonen M, van Dijk B, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J, Baker S, Caraway T, Kasulis H, Mears A, Smith J, Swim L, Wood M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Using hearing aid adaptive directional microphones to enhance cochlear implant performance.
    Chung K, Zeng FG.
    Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 250(1-2):27-37. PubMed ID: 19450437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
    Spahr AJ, Dorman MF.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An analysis of the effects of electrical field interaction with an acoustic model of cochlear implants.
    Strydom T, Hanekom JJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2213-26. PubMed ID: 21476676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K, Barco A, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 46.