These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

245 related items for PubMed ID: 17487270

  • 1. A preference for a sexual signal keeps females safe.
    Kim TW, Christy JH, Choe JC.
    PLoS One; 2007 May 09; 2(5):e422. PubMed ID: 17487270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk.
    Kim TW, Christy JH, Dennenmoser S, Choe JC.
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Feb 22; 276(1657):775-80. PubMed ID: 19019792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR.
    Evolution; 2007 Dec 22; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM, Reisland M, Boughmann JW.
    Evolution; 2009 Feb 22; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD, Pitcher TE.
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan 22; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation.
    Svensson EI, Karlsson K, Friberg M, Eroukhmanoff F.
    Curr Biol; 2007 Nov 20; 17(22):1943-7. PubMed ID: 17935996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Sexual selection for male dominance reduces opportunities for female mate choice in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus).
    Reichard M, Bryja J, Ondracková M, Dávidová M, Kaniewska P, Smith C.
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Apr 20; 14(5):1533-42. PubMed ID: 15813791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of a parasitic nematode on male mate choice in a livebearing fish with a coercive mating system (western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis).
    Deaton R.
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan 20; 80(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18765273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC.
    Evolution; 2005 Feb 20; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.