These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


334 related items for PubMed ID: 17495582

  • 1. SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment.
    Polly DW, Glassman SD, Schwender JD, Shaffrey CI, Branch C, Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Lumbar Spine Study Group.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May 15; 32(11 Suppl):S20-6. PubMed ID: 17495582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA, Bendo JA, Quirno M, Errico T, Goldstein J, Spivak J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec 01; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
    Rampersaud YR, Ravi B, Lewis SJ, Stas V, Barron R, Davey R, Mahomed N.
    Spine J; 2008 Dec 01; 8(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17669690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.
    Glassman S, Gornet MF, Branch C, Polly D, Peloza J, Schwender JD, Carreon L.
    Spine J; 2006 Dec 01; 6(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16413443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
    Rampersaud YR, Tso P, Walker KR, Lewis SJ, Davey JR, Mahomed NN, Coyte PC.
    Spine J; 2014 Feb 01; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of short-term SF-36 results between total joint arthroplasty and cervical spine decompression and fusion or arthroplasty.
    Anderson PA, Puschak TJ, Sasso RC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan 15; 34(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 19139668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Postoperative improvement in health-related quality of life: a national comparison of surgical treatment for focal (one- to two-level) lumbar spinal stenosis compared with total joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.
    Rampersaud YR, Wai EK, Fisher CG, Yee AJ, Dvorak MF, Finkelstein JA, Gandhi R, Abraham EP, Lewis SJ, Alexander DI, Oxner WM, Davey JR, Mahomed N.
    Spine J; 2011 Nov 15; 11(11):1033-41. PubMed ID: 22122836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The cost effectiveness of single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion at 5 years after surgery.
    Glassman SD, Polly DW, Dimar JR, Carreon LY.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr 20; 37(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20489676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC, Foulk DM, Hahn M.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan 15; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Lumbar spinal fusion versus anterior lumbar disc replacement: the financial implications.
    Patel VV, Estes S, Lindley EM, Burger E.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct 15; 21(7):473-6. PubMed ID: 18836357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility after surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee--part 1: long-term change in health-related quality of life.
    Rampersaud YR, Lewis SJ, Davey JR, Gandhi R, Mahomed NN.
    Spine J; 2014 Feb 01; 14(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 24325880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.
    Zanoli G.
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Jun 01; 76(318):5-47. PubMed ID: 16175972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Financial incentives for lumbar surgery: a critical analysis of physician reimbursement for decompression and fusion procedures.
    Whang PG, Lim MR, Sasso RC, Skelton A, Brown ZB, Greg Anderson D, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug 01; 21(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 18679090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of surgical volume and the early experience with lumbar total disc replacement as part of the investigational device exemption study of the Charité Artificial Disc.
    Regan JJ, McAfee PC, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, Geisler FH, Garcia R, Maxwell JH.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep 01; 31(19):2270-6. PubMed ID: 16946666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
    Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec 15; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
    Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Djurasovic M, Dimar JR, Johnson JR, Puno RM, Campbell MJ.
    Spine J; 2009 Dec 15; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of analytic approaches for the economic evaluation of new technologies alongside multicenter clinical trials.
    Taira DA, Seto TB, Siegrist R, Cosgrove R, Berezin R, Cohen DJ.
    Am Heart J; 2003 Mar 15; 145(3):452-8. PubMed ID: 12660668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.