These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

403 related items for PubMed ID: 17495655

  • 1. Dosimetric comparison between different quantities for limiting exposure in the RF band: rationale and implications for guidelines.
    Lin JC.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 17495655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Implications of clinical RF hyperthermia on protection limits in the RF range.
    Wust P, Nadobny J, Szimtenings M, Stetter E, Gellermann J.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 17495657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Thermal mechanisms of interaction of radiofrequency energy with biological systems with relevance to exposure guidelines.
    Foster KR, Glaser R.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):609-20. PubMed ID: 17495663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Demodulation in tissue, the relevant parameters and the implications for limiting exposure.
    Silny J.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):604-8. PubMed ID: 17495662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.
    Jokela K.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 17495653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
    van Rongen E, Saunders RD, van Deventer ET, Repacholi MH.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Exposure of biological material to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses: dosimetric implications.
    Simicevic N.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):574-83. PubMed ID: 17495658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The development of biomedical approaches and concepts in radiofrequency radiation protection.
    Czerski P.
    J Microw Power Electromagn Energy; 1986 Jun; 21(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 3635631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accounting for human variability and sensitivity in setting standards for electromagnetic fields.
    Bailey WH, Erdreich LS.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 17495668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. FDTD calculations of specific energy absorption rate in a seated voxel model of the human body from 10 MHz to 3 GHz.
    Findlay RP, Dimbylow PJ.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May 07; 51(9):2339-52. PubMed ID: 16625046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A neurobiological basis for ELF guidelines.
    Saunders RD, Jefferys JG.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun 07; 92(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 17495661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dominant factors influencing whole-body average SAR due to far-field exposure in whole-body resonance frequency and GHz regions.
    Hirata A, Kodera S, Wang J, Fujiwara O.
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Sep 07; 28(6):484-7. PubMed ID: 17486582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.