These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

397 related items for PubMed ID: 17496643

  • 1. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB, Downing M, Osberger MJ, Litvak L.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Firszt JB, Koch DB, Downing M, Litvak L.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 17667771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
    Chang YT, Yang HM, Lin YH, Liu SH, Wu JL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations.
    Berenstein CK, Mens LH, Mulder JJ, Vanpoucke FJ.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 18595189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of widening electrode separation on current steering performance.
    Snel-Bongers J, Briaire JJ, Vanpoucke FJ, Frijns JH.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Apr; 32(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21063206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.
    Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Segel P, Kessler D.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004 Apr; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.
    Boyd PJ.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Apr; 32(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 21248642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K, Barco A, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Electrically evoked compound action potential measures for virtual channels versus physical electrodes.
    Hughes ML, Goulson AM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Apr; 32(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 21187752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.