These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


950 related items for PubMed ID: 17497443

  • 1. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
    Rountas C, Vlychou M, Vassiou K, Liakopoulos V, Kapsalaki E, Koukoulis G, Fezoulidis IV, Stefanidis I.
    Ren Fail; 2007; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Noninvasive investigation for renal artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and color Doppler sonography as compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Voiculescu A, Hofer M, Hetzel GR, Malms J, Mödder U, Grabensee B, Hollenbeck M.
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 2001 Oct; 23(7):521-31. PubMed ID: 11710754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.
    De Cobelli F, Venturini M, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, Salvioni M, Angeli E, Scifo P, Garancini MP, Quartagno R, Bianchi G, Del Maschio A.
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 10671583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Non-invasive imaging cannot replace formal angiography in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension.
    Trautmann A, Roebuck DJ, McLaren CA, Brennan E, Marks SD, Tullus K.
    Pediatr Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 32(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27747454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
    Gaddikeri S, Mitsumori L, Vaidya S, Hippe DS, Bhargava P, Dighe MK.
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014 Mar; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA.
    Stacul F, Gava S, Belgrano M, Cernic S, Pagnan L, Pozzi Mucelli F, Cova MA.
    Radiol Med; 2008 Jun; 113(4):529-46. PubMed ID: 18480971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA.
    Fraioli F, Catalano C, Bertoletti L, Danti M, Fanelli F, Napoli A, Cavacece M, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 16683091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Noninvasive assessment of renal artery stenosis. A comparison of MR angiography, color Doppler sonography, and intraarterial angiography.
    Strotzer M, Fellner CM, Geissler A, Gmeinwieser J, Kohler SM, Krämer BK, Kromer EP.
    Acta Radiol; 1995 May; 36(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 7742115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Assessment of renal arteries in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: comparison of Doppler sonography with multiphase MR angiography].
    Gołebiowski M, Cieszanowski A, Polański S, Januszewicz M, Symonides B, Gaciong Z.
    Przegl Lek; 2004 May; 61(5):491-5. PubMed ID: 15515812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
    Albert TS, Akahane M, Parienty I, Yellin N, Catalá V, Alomar X, Prot A, Tomizawa N, Xue H, Katabathina VS, Lopera JE, Jin Z.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis.
    Chan YL, Leung CB, Yu SC, Yeung DK, Li PK.
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 11222071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.
    Völk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, Manke C, Nitz WR, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, Link J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1583-8. PubMed ID: 10845486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Angeretti MG, Lumia D, Canì A, Barresi M, Nocchi Cardim L, Piacentino F, Maresca AM, Novario R, Genovese EA, Fugazzola C.
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 23550187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
    Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, Di Paolo P, Saba L, Cavallo Marincola B, Zini C, Cartocci G, Di Mare L, Catalano C, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Detection of renal artery stenosis: prospective comparison of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced scintigraphy, and MR angiography.
    Qanadli SD, Soulez G, Therasse E, Nicolet V, Turpin S, Froment D, Courteau M, Guertin MC, Oliva VL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1123-9. PubMed ID: 11641186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 48.