These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

324 related items for PubMed ID: 17502748

  • 21. Kinetics of Competitive Adsorption between Lysozyme and Lactoferrin on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses and the Effect on Lysozyme Activity.
    Hall B, Jones L, Forrest JA.
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 May; 40(6):622-31. PubMed ID: 25251834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Oxygen permeability and water content of silicone hydrogel contact lens materials.
    Efron N, Morgan PB, Cameron ID, Brennan NA, Goodwin M.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 84(4):328-37. PubMed ID: 17435503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials.
    Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jan; 29(1 Suppl):S75-9; discussion S83-4, S192-4. PubMed ID: 12772737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Localization of lysozyme sorption to conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses using confocal microscopy.
    Luensmann D, Zhang F, Subbaraman L, Sheardown H, Jones L.
    Curr Eye Res; 2009 Aug; 34(8):683-97. PubMed ID: 19899996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Uptake and release of dexamethasone phosphate from silicone hydrogel and group I, II, and IV hydrogel contact lenses.
    Boone A, Hui A, Jones L.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):260-7. PubMed ID: 19657281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparative study of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses used as bandage contact lenses after LASEK.
    Gil-Cazorla R, Teus MA, Hernández-Verdejo JL, De Benito-Llopis L, García-González M.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Sep; 85(9):884-8. PubMed ID: 18772724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Oliveira ME, Oliveira R, Vilar EY, Azeredo J.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 17291818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The efficiency of contact lens care regimens on protein removal from hydrogel and silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Luensmann D, Heynen M, Liu L, Sheardown H, Jones L.
    Mol Vis; 2010 Jan 20; 16():79-92. PubMed ID: 20098668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Short-term physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, Schnider CM, Efron N.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Dec 20; 81(12):911-21. PubMed ID: 15592115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparison of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses for bullous keratoplasty.
    Lim N, Vogt U.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Sep 20; 32(5):250-3. PubMed ID: 16974160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components.
    Cheng L, Muller SJ, Radke CJ.
    Curr Eye Res; 2004 Feb 20; 28(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 14972715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. In vitro evaluation of lipids adsorbed on silicone hydrogel contact lenses using a new gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analytical method.
    Iwata M, Ohno S, Kawai T, Ichijima H, Cavanagh HD.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Sep 20; 34(5):272-80. PubMed ID: 18779667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses.
    Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Apr 20; 40(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 10102286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Bacterial adhesion to worn silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Real Oliveira ME, Oliveira R, Vilar EY, Azeredo J.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul 20; 85(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 18594343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Ultraviolet (UV) transmittance characteristics of daily disposable and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Moore L, Ferreira JT.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2006 Jul 20; 29(3):115-22. PubMed ID: 16697696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The effect of surface treatment of silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the attachment of Acanthamoeba castellanii trophozoites.
    Beattie TK, Tomlinson A.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Nov 20; 35(6):316-9. PubMed ID: 19826253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Selectivity and localization of lysozyme uptake in contemporary hydrogel contact lens materials.
    Heynen M, Babaei Omali N, Fadli Z, Coles-Brennan C, Subbaraman LN, Jones L.
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2017 Sep 20; 28(13):1351-1364. PubMed ID: 28539099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of silicone hydrogel lens wear with a new multipurpose disinfection care product.
    Zigler L, Cedrone R, Evans D, Helbert-Green C, Shah T.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Sep 20; 33(5):236-43. PubMed ID: 17873626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparing goblet cell densities in patients wearing disposable hydrogel contact lenses versus silicone hydrogel contact lenses in an extended-wear modality.
    Lievens CW, Connor CG, Murphy H.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Oct 20; 29(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 14555901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Attachment of Acanthamoeba to first- and second-generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Beattie TK, Tomlinson A, McFadyen AK.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jan 20; 113(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 16360208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.