These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

324 related items for PubMed ID: 17502748

  • 41. The effect of lens wear on refractive index of conventional hydrogel and silicone-hydrogel contact lenses: a comparative study.
    Lira M, Santos L, Azeredo J, Yebra-Pimentel E, Real Oliveira ME.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2008 Apr; 31(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 17964212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Composition of incubation solution impacts in vitro protein uptake to silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Jadi S, Heynen M, Luensmann D, Jones L.
    Mol Vis; 2012 Apr; 18():337-47. PubMed ID: 22355245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. A solid-phase assay for the quantitation of total protein eluted from balafilcon, lotrafilcon, and etafilcon contact lenses.
    Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, Senchyna M, Jones L.
    Curr Eye Res; 2008 Aug; 33(8):631-40. PubMed ID: 18696338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. A comparison of regimen methods for the removal and inactivation of bacteria, fungi and Acanthamoeba from two types of silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Kilvington S, Lonnen J.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Apr; 32(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19201251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Initial comfort of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear.
    Martin R, de Juan V, Rodriguez G, Martin S, Fonseca S.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17178252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Glasier MA, Lorentz H, Senchyna M, Jones L.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 83(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 16534456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Hyphal penetration of worn hydrogel contact lenses by Fusarium.
    Ahearn DG, Zhang S, Ward MA, Simmons RB, Stulting RD.
    Cornea; 2009 Sep; 28(8):914-7. PubMed ID: 19654522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Corneal shape changes induced by first and second generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses in daily wear.
    Alba-Bueno F, Beltran-Masgoret A, Sanjuan C, Biarnés M, Marín J.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Apr; 32(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 19181564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Extraction versus in situ techniques for measuring surface-adsorbed lysozyme.
    Hall B, Phan CM, Subbaraman L, Jones LW, Forrest J.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 91(9):1062-70. PubMed ID: 25083835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Relative in vitro rates of attachment and penetration of hydrogel soft contact lenses by haplotypes of fusarium.
    Ahearn DG, Zhang S, Stulting RD, Schwam BL, Simmons RB, Ward MA, Pierce GE, Crow SA.
    Cornea; 2009 May; 28(4):447-50. PubMed ID: 19411965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Deposition rates and lens care influence on galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Nichols JJ.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):751-7. PubMed ID: 17041321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Use of silicone hydrogel material for daily wear.
    Guillon M, Maissa C.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):5-10; quiz 71. PubMed ID: 17098464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Enzymatic quantification of cholesterol and cholesterol esters from silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Pucker AD, Thangavelu M, Nichols JJ.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):2949-54. PubMed ID: 20089871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Comparison of 3 silicone hydrogel bandage soft contact lenses for pain control after photorefractive keratectomy.
    Taylor KR, Caldwell MC, Payne AM, Apsey DA, Townley JR, Reilly CD, Panday VA.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1798-804. PubMed ID: 25217073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Contact lens-induced circumlimbal staining in silicone hydrogel contact lenses worn on a daily wear basis.
    Maïssa C, Guillon M, Garofalo RJ.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 22146704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a).
    Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Dec; 32(6):281-6. PubMed ID: 17099389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Changes in ultraviolet transmittance of hydrogel and silicone-hydrogel contact lenses induced by wear.
    Osuagwu UL, Ogbuehi KC, Almubrad TM.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2014 Jan; 40(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 24335452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. The clinical performance of a silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear in an Asian population.
    Long B, McNally J.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Mar; 32(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 16538125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Hydrogel lens comfort in challenging environments and the effect of refitting with silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Young G, Riley CM, Chalmers RL, Hunt C.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 84(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 17435513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Quantification of non-polar lipid deposits on senofilcon a contact lenses.
    Heynen M, Lorentz H, Srinivasan S, Jones L.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Oct; 88(10):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21804435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.