These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

835 related items for PubMed ID: 17507288

  • 1. Transcranial electric stimulation for intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: Stimulation parameters and electrode montages.
    Szelényi A, Kothbauer KF, Deletis V.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jul; 118(7):1586-95. PubMed ID: 17507288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Transcranial electric stimulation for intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: dependence of required stimulation current on interstimulus interval value.
    Joksimovic B, Szelenyi A, Seifert V, Damjanovic A, Damjanovic A, Rasulic L.
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2015 May; 76(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 25594816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The refractory period of fast conducting corticospinal tract axons in man and its implications for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials.
    Novak K, de Camargo AB, Neuwirth M, Kothbauer K, Amassian VE, Deletis V.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Aug; 115(8):1931-41. PubMed ID: 15261873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Transcranial and direct cortical stimulation for motor evoked potential monitoring in intracerebral aneurysm surgery.
    Szelényi A, Langer D, Beck J, Raabe A, Flamm ES, Seifert V, Deletis V.
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2007 Dec; 37(6):391-8. PubMed ID: 18083494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Methodology for intra-operative recording of the corticobulbar motor evoked potentials from cricothyroid muscles.
    Deletis V, Fernández-Conejero I, Ulkatan S, Rogić M, Carbó EL, Hiltzik D.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Sep; 122(9):1883-9. PubMed ID: 21440494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Methodology for intraoperatively eliciting motor evoked potentials in the vocal muscles by electrical stimulation of the corticobulbar tract.
    Deletis V, Fernandez-Conejero I, Ulkatan S, Costantino P.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):336-41. PubMed ID: 19136297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cortical localization of external urethral sphincter activation by transcranial electrical stimulation.
    Haghighi SS, Agrawal S.
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 46(6):343-8. PubMed ID: 17147076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring in scoliosis surgery: comparison of desflurane/nitrous oxide with propofol total intravenous anesthetic regimens.
    Lo YL, Dan YF, Tan YE, Nurjannah S, Tan SB, Tan CT, Raman S.
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2006 Jul; 18(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 16799350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Optimum interpulse interval for transcranial electrical train stimulation to elicit motor evoked potentials of maximal amplitude in both upper and lower extremity target muscles.
    van Hal C, Hoebink E, Polak HE, Racz I, de Kleuver M, Journee HL.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Oct; 124(10):2054-9. PubMed ID: 23735307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The application of tetanic stimulation of the unilateral tibial nerve before transcranial stimulation can augment the amplitudes of myogenic motor-evoked potentials from the muscles in the bilateral upper and lower limbs.
    Hayashi H, Kawaguchi M, Yamamoto Y, Inoue S, Koizumi M, Ueda Y, Takakura Y, Furuya H.
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jul; 107(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 18635490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Motor evoked potentials following highly frequent transcranial magnetoelectrical motor cortex stimulation: normal data and potential modulation by stimulation-dependent inhibitory and activating mechanisms.
    Rohde V, Neubert M, Reinacher P, Weinzierl M, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Gilsbach JM.
    Zentralbl Neurochir; 2005 Aug; 66(3):105-11. PubMed ID: 16116552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison between the C5 or C6-Cz electrode assembly and C3 or C4-Cz assembly for transcranial electric motor activation of muscular response of the contralateral facial nerve.
    Verst SM, Chung TM, Sucena AC, Maldaun MV, Aguiar PH.
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Dec; 154(12):2229-35. PubMed ID: 23053280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Optimal parameters of transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials of the tibialis anterior muscle during pediatric scoliosis surgery.
    Azabou E, Manel V, Andre-obadia N, Fischer C, Mauguiere F, Peiffer C, Lofaso F, Shils JL.
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2013 Oct; 43(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 24094910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of transcranial stimulating electrode montages over the head for lower-extremity transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring.
    Tomio R, Akiyama T, Ohira T, Yoshida K.
    J Neurosurg; 2017 Jun; 126(6):1951-1958. PubMed ID: 27662531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Intraoperative neurophysiologic discovery of uncrossed sensory and motor pathways in a patient with horizontal gaze palsy and scoliosis.
    MacDonald DB, Streletz LJ, Al-Zayed Z, Abdool S, Stigsby B.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):576-82. PubMed ID: 15036053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery.
    Dong CC, Macdonald DB, Akagami R, Westerberg B, Alkhani A, Kanaan I, Hassounah M.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):588-96. PubMed ID: 15721072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison Between Cz-C3/C4 and C3-C4 Montages to Protect Against Peripheral Stimulation in Transcranial Facial Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring.
    Matsuoka R, Hamada N, Nishimura N, Mitsui T, Shiraishi Y, Hayami H, Fukutome K, Tei R, Shin Y, Aketa S, Kato D, Kita T, Motoyama Y.
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2024 Sep 01; 41(6):565-569. PubMed ID: 37963331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Higher success rate with transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials using constant-voltage stimulation compared with constant-current stimulation in patients undergoing spinal surgery.
    Shigematsu H, Kawaguchi M, Hayashi H, Takatani T, Iwata E, Tanaka M, Okuda A, Morimoto Y, Masuda K, Tanaka Y, Tanaka Y.
    Spine J; 2017 Oct 01; 17(10):1472-1479. PubMed ID: 28483707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of reliability of post-tetanic motor-evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery under general anesthesia.
    Hayashi H, Kawaguchi M, Yamamoto Y, Inoue S, Koizumi M, Ueda Y, Takakura Y, Furuya H.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec 15; 33(26):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 19092611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 42.