These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
120 related items for PubMed ID: 1751402
1. Use of nuclear image cytometry, histopathological grading and DNA cytometry to make breast cancer prognosis more objective. Theissig F, Dimmer V, Haroske G, Kunze KD, Meyer W. Anal Cell Pathol; 1991 Nov; 3(6):351-60. PubMed ID: 1751402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Morphological possibilities for objectification of the prognosis for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast]. Theissig F, Haroske G, Dimmer V, Kunze KD, Meyer W. Zentralbl Pathol; 1991 Nov; 137(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 1718409 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Grading, staging, DNA content and prognosis of invasive ductal breast cancer]. Theissig F, Kunze KD, Haroske G, Meyer W, Dimmer V. Zentralbl Chir; 1990 Nov; 115(7):433-9. PubMed ID: 2164288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 'Blind' multicenter evaluation of the prognostic value of DNA image cytometric and morphometric features in invasive breast cancer. Theissig F, Baak JP, Schuurmans L, Haroske G, Meyer W, Kunze KD. Anal Cell Pathol; 1996 Mar; 10(2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8721952 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative DNA analysis of breast cancer by flow cytometry and image analysis. Borgiani L, Cogorno P, Toso F, Gallo L, Buccaran G, Rovida S, Canepa M. Pathologica; 1994 Aug; 86(4):356-9. PubMed ID: 7535909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Grading and prognosis of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma by nuclear image analysis in tissue sections. Kunze KD, Haroske G, Dimmer V, Meyer W, Theissig F. Pathol Res Pract; 1989 Nov; 185(5):689-93. PubMed ID: 2560542 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Introduction of the cytological grading, the nuclear area, the DNA index and the DNA histogram type in the setting up of a score for ductal breast carcinoma. Budel V, Merle S, Gasperin P, Collet JF, De Maublanc MA, Kiss R. Anticancer Res; 1994 Nov; 14(6B):2845-51. PubMed ID: 7532932 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic significance of image cytometry DNA parameters in tissue sections from breast and gastric cancers. Haroske G, Kunze KD, Theissig F. Anal Cell Pathol; 1991 Jan; 3(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 1848088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Static and flow cytometric DNA analysis compared to histologic prognostic factors in a cohort of stage T2 breast cancer. Arnerlöv C, Emdin SO, Roos G, Angström T, Bjersing L, Angquist KA, Jonsson H. Eur J Surg Oncol; 1990 Jun; 16(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 2347415 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluorescence-based analysis of DNA ploidy and cell proliferation within fine-needle samplings of breast tumors: a new approach using automated image cytometry. Truong K, Vielh P, Malfoy B, Klijanienko J, Dutrillaux B, Bourgeois CA. Cancer; 1998 Oct 25; 84(5):309-16. PubMed ID: 9801206 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic significance of morphological parameters and flow cytometric DNA analysis in carcinoma of the breast. Visscher DW, Zarbo RJ, Greenawald KA, Crissman JD. Pathol Annu; 1990 Oct 25; 25 Pt 1():171-210. PubMed ID: 2153277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Impact of DNA image cytometry (ICM) parameter and established prognostic factors on disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of node-negative breast cancer (NNBC) patients]. Schlotter CM, Vogt U, Bosse U, Wassmann K. Zentralbl Gynakol; 2003 Sep 25; 125(9):368-74. PubMed ID: 14569519 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective nuclear grading for node-negative breast cancer patients: comparison of quasi-3D and 2D image-analysis based on light microscopic images. Albert R, Müller JG, Kristen P, Harms H. Lab Invest; 1998 Mar 25; 78(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 9520938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Importance of nuclear morphology in breast cancer prognosis. Wolberg WH, Street WN, Mangasarian OL. Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Nov 25; 5(11):3542-8. PubMed ID: 10589770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic value of static cytometry in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: recurrence rate and survival in a group of patients at 10 years follow-up. Cai T, Margallo E, Nesi G, Giubilei G, Rizzo M, Bartoletti R. Oncol Rep; 2006 Jan 25; 15(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 16328058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic value of S-phase fraction in lymph-node-negative breast cancer by image and flow cytometric analysis. Peiró G, Lerma E, Climent MA, Seguí MA, Alonso MC, Prat J. Mod Pathol; 1997 Mar 25; 10(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 9071729 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cell nucleus analyses on the heterogenicity, proliferation and metastasis of malignant tumors]. Kunze KD, Haroske G, Dimmer V, Meyer W, Theissig F. Acta Histochem Suppl; 1990 Mar 25; 39():147-54. PubMed ID: 1964231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognosis of early cervical cancer (FIGO Stages IA2, IB, and IIA) in northern Norway predicted by malignancy grading score and objective morphometric image analysis. Eggen T, Arnes M, Moe B, Straume B, Orbo A. Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2007 Oct 25; 26(4):447-56. PubMed ID: 17885497 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Malignancy grading in breast cancer as assessed by nuclear DNA content]. Nishi T, Okajima K, Taguchi T, Mizutani H, Sogabe T, Uragami I, Sekimoto T. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Apr 25; 89(4):576-81. PubMed ID: 3405196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and proliferation in 309 colorectal carcinomas as determined by two-color multiparametric DNA flow cytometry. Zarbo RJ, Nakhleh RE, Brown RD, Kubus JJ, Ma CK, Mackowiak P. Cancer; 1997 Jun 01; 79(11):2073-86. PubMed ID: 9179053 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]