These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

771 related items for PubMed ID: 17531311

  • 1. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber-reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix.
    Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Watts DC, Lassila LV.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 17531311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.
    Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV.
    J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities.
    Yazici AR, Ozgünaltay G, Dayangaç B.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Sep; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 14653293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites.
    Juloski J, Carrabba M, Aragoneses JM, Forner L, Vichi A, Ferrari M.
    Am J Dent; 2013 Oct; 26(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 24479279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Oct; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Gingival microleakage of class V composite restorations with fiber inserts.
    Ahmed W, El-Badrawy W, Kulkarni G, Prakki A, El-Mowafy O.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul 01; 14(4):622-8. PubMed ID: 24309339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
    Rodrigues Junior SA, Pin LF, Machado G, Della Bona A, Demarco FF.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010 Jul 01; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jul 01; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V, Logani A, Jain V, Shah N.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Jul 01; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD, Uçtasli MB, Eligüzeloglu E, Ozcan S, Omürlü H.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Jul 01; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.