These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

345 related items for PubMed ID: 17538812

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of portable microbial samplers for estimating inhalation exposure to viable biological agents.
    Yao M, Mainelis G.
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 16912697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.
    Kenny LC, Bowry A, Crook B, Stancliffe JD.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 10518465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Integration of high volume portable aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and qPCR in monitoring bioaerosols.
    He Q, Yao M.
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Mar; 13(3):706-12. PubMed ID: 21258725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A small change in the design of a slit bioaerosol impactor significantly improves its collection characteristics.
    Grinshpun SA, Adhikari A, Cho SH, Kim KY, Lee T, Reponen T.
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Aug; 9(8):855-61. PubMed ID: 17671667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K.
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov 15; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H, Veillette M, Bilodeau GJ, Duchaine C.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec 01; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of a passive aerosol sampler to size-selective pump samplers in indoor environments.
    Wagner J, Macher JM.
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003 Dec 01; 64(5):630-9. PubMed ID: 14521436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Size-separated sampling and analysis of isocyanates in workplace aerosols. Part I. Denuder--cascade impactor sampler.
    Dahlin J, Spanne M, Karlsson D, Dalene M, Skarping G.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Jul 01; 52(5):361-74. PubMed ID: 18458354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of bioaerosol sampling techniques for the detection of Chlamydophila psittaci in contaminated air.
    Van Droogenbroeck C, Van Risseghem M, Braeckman L, Vanrompay D.
    Vet Microbiol; 2009 Mar 16; 135(1-2):31-7. PubMed ID: 18963601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.
    Lee KS, Bartlett KH, Brauer M, Stephens GM, Black WA, Teschke K.
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct 16; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone.
    Lidén G, Surakka J.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar 16; 53(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 19196747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.