These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
142 related items for PubMed ID: 17540606
21. Contrast-enhanced sonography helps in discrimination of benign from malignant adnexal masses. Marret H, Sauget S, Giraudeau B, Brewer M, Ranger-Moore J, Body G, Tranquart F. J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Dec; 23(12):1629-39; quiz 1641-42. PubMed ID: 15557306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Value of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound for characterizing adnexal masses. Huchon C, Metzger U, Bats AS, Bensaid C, Chatellier G, Azizi M, Lefrère-Belda MA, Dujardin A, Bernard JP, Lécuru F. J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 May; 38(5):832-40. PubMed ID: 22413992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease. Salem S, White LM, Lai J. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Color Doppler energy prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using logistic regression models. Marret H, Ecochard R, Giraudeau B, Golfier F, Raudrant D, Lansac J. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 12493050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses with transvaginal ultrasonography and colour blood flow imaging. Sawicki W, Spiewankiewicz B, Cendrowski K, Stelmachów J. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 22(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 11446479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography. Zhang J, Mironov S, Hricak H, Ishill NM, Moskowitz CS, Soslow RA, Chi DS. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008 Dec; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C, Paladini D, Van Calster B, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Valentin L. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [The use of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional color and power-Doppler in the diagnosis of blood flow indices of adnexal tumors]. Czekierdowski A, Stachowicz N, Smoleń A, Kotarski J. Ginekol Pol; 2006 Apr; 77(4):296-306. PubMed ID: 16875035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. B-mode, utero-ovarian and intratumoural transvaginal colour Doppler ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of ovarian tumours. Mercé LT, Caballero RA, Barco MJ, Bau S, López G. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Jan; 76(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 9481556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Clinical assessment of selected vascularization attributes of adnexal masses in preoperative prediction of tumor malignancy]. Witczak K, Szpurek D, Moszyński R, Sroka Ł, Sajdak S. Ginekol Pol; 2007 May; 78(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 17867328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of ovarian volume, gray-scale and color flow indices obtained using transvaginal three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography. Järvelä IY, Sladkevicius P, Tekay AH, Campbell S, Nargund G. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 12666224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Improving the preoperative classification of adnexal masses as benign or malignant by second-stage tests. Daemen A, Valentin L, Fruscio R, Van Holsbeke C, Melis GB, Guerriero S, Czekierdowski A, Jurkovic D, Ombelet W, Rossi A, Vergote I, Bourne T, De Moor B, Timmerman D. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 20814878 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The diagnosis of ovarian cancer: is color Doppler imaging reproducible and accurate in examiners with different degrees of experience? Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Graupera B, Hereter L, Melis GB. J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Feb; 20(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 21265646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Doppler color-echo and flowmetric evaluations in ovarian tumors in postmenopausal patients]. de Albertis P, Serafini G, Cavallo A, Orio O, Gandolfo N, Quadri P. Radiol Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):488-92. PubMed ID: 8190933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A critical analysis of Doppler velocimetry in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign ovarian masses. Marchesini AC, Magrio FA, Berezowski AT, Neto OB, Nogueira AA, Candido dos Reis FJ. J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2008 Apr; 17(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 18240986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of 'pattern recognition' and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation. Valentin L, Hagen B, Tingulstad S, Eik-Nes S. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 18(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 11778996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of intratumoural indices of blood flow velocity and impedance for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Tailor A, Jurkovic D, Bourne TH, Natucci M, Collins WP, Campbell S. Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996 Oct; 22(7):837-43. PubMed ID: 8923703 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional power Doppler sonography for differentiation of adnexal masses. Kupesic S, Kurjak A. Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):452-8. PubMed ID: 10960641 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Transvaginal ultrasound, color flow, and Doppler waveform of the postmenopausal adnexal mass. Kurjak A, Schulman H, Sosic A, Zalud I, Shalan H. Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 1448259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Three dimensional ultrasound and power doppler in assessment of uterine and ovarian angiogenesis: a prospective study. Kurjak A, Kupesić S. Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):413-20. PubMed ID: 10411971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]