These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


151 related items for PubMed ID: 17543060

  • 21. The Human Genome Project and the end of insurance.
    Berry RM.
    Univ Fla J Law Public Policy; 1996; 7(2):205-56. PubMed ID: 11660500
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. State responses to biotechnology.
    Harris RC.
    Politics Life Sci; 2015; 34(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 26399943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Genetic testing.
    Terry SF.
    Genet Test; 2008 Jun; 12(2):175-6. PubMed ID: 18554161
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Genetic testing and the future of disability insurance: thinking about discrimination in the genetic age.
    Miller PS.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 35(2 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 17543057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Genetic justice: discrimination by employers and insurance companies based on predictive genetic information.
    Ellis AM.
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 34(4):1071-99. PubMed ID: 15568280
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Insurers' use of genetic information.
    Hall MA.
    Jurimetrics; 1996 Jun; 37(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 11658096
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Predictive genetic testing: congruence of disability insurers' interests with the public interest.
    Silvers A.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 35(2 Suppl):52-8. PubMed ID: 17543058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Genetics and privacy.
    Hustead JL, Goldman J.
    Am J Law Med; 2002 Jun; 28(2-3):285-307. PubMed ID: 12197466
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Genetic prophecy and genetic privacy.
    Annas GJ.
    Trial; 1996 Jan; 32(1):18-20, 22-25. PubMed ID: 11660605
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. German call to limit use of genetic data by insurance companies.
    Nature; 1999 Jul 22; 400(6742):304. PubMed ID: 11645163
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The impact of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act on occupational health nursing.
    Litchfield SM.
    AAOHN J; 2009 Nov 22; 57(11):439-40. PubMed ID: 19968208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Genetic screening, health care and the insurance industry. Should genetic information be made available to insurers?
    Ossa DF, Towse A.
    Eur J Health Econ; 2004 Jun 22; 5(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 15452747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Why treating genetic information separately is a bad idea.
    Rothstein MA.
    Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999 Jun 22; 4(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15706721
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Genetic testing explored in Congressional briefing.
    Health Care Financ Rev; 2001 Jun 22; 22(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 12418500
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Senate sends to House a bill on safeguarding genetic privacy.
    Stolberg SG.
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct 15; ():A12. PubMed ID: 14610769
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Direct-to-consumer genomics companies should provide guidance to their customers on (not) sharing personal genomic information.
    Garrison NA, Non AL.
    Am J Bioeth; 2014 Oct 15; 14(11):55-7. PubMed ID: 25325815
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Genotype discrimination: the complex case for some legislative protection.
    Greely HT.
    Univ PA Law Rev; 2001 May 15; 149(5):1483-1505. PubMed ID: 15732207
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.