These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1003 related items for PubMed ID: 17547989

  • 1. Comparing pure-tone audiometry and auditory steady state response for the measurement of hearing loss.
    Ahn JH, Lee HS, Kim YJ, Yoon TH, Chung JW.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jun; 136(6):966-71. PubMed ID: 17547989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH, Ho HC, Wu HP.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Auditory steady-state responses for children with severe to profound hearing loss.
    Swanepoel D, Hugo R, Roode R.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):531-5. PubMed ID: 15148172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Auditory sensitivity in children using the auditory steady-state response.
    Firszt JB, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Burg LS, Wackym PA.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):536-40. PubMed ID: 15148173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry.
    Scherf F, Brokx J, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 May; 45(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 16717018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss.
    van der Drift JF, Brocaar MP, van Zanten GA.
    Audiology; 1987 May; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3593096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Validity of pure-tone hearing screening at well-child visits.
    Halloran DR, Hardin JM, Wall TC.
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Feb; 163(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19188648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reliability of electric response audiometry using 80 Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Kaf WA, Sabo DL, Durrant JD, Rubinstein E.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):477-86. PubMed ID: 17005490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses in evaluating the hearing thresholds of occupational noise-exposed workers.
    Hsu RF, Chen SS, Lu SN, Ho CK, Lin HF.
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Aug; 27(8):330-5. PubMed ID: 21802644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 51.