These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

169 related items for PubMed ID: 17552722

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carroll J, Tiaden S, Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.
    Souza P, Arehart K, Miller CW, Muralimanohar RK.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20739892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing.
    Visram AS, Azadpour M, Kluk K, McKay CM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4042-50. PubMed ID: 22559377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Li N, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2287-94. PubMed ID: 18397033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH, Croghan NB, Muralimanohar RK.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Apr; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Zhang T, Spahr AJ, Dorman MF.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 19915474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
    Rader T, Adel Y, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Apr; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F, Yoho SE, Youngdahl CL, Healy EW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone.
    Brown CA, Bacon SP.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 19546806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH, Donaldson GS, Kong YY.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Oct; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Oct; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Robustness against distortion of fundamental frequency cues in simulated electro-acoustic hearing.
    Vermeulen A, Verschuur C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):229. PubMed ID: 27475149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Roles of voice onset time and F0 in stop consonant voicing perception: effects of masking noise and low-pass filtering.
    Winn MB, Chatterjee M, Idsardi WJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1097-107. PubMed ID: 23785185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.