These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

289 related items for PubMed ID: 1755454

  • 41. Late infertile days in early postpartum cycles.
    Hatherley LI.
    Clin Reprod Fertil; 1985 Mar; 3(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 4038908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Fertility awareness and natural family planning. Opinion.
    Lamprecht VM, Pyper C.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1996 Mar; 17(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 12320446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. High prevalence of subtle and severe menstrual disturbances in exercising women: confirmation using daily hormone measures.
    De Souza MJ, Toombs RJ, Scheid JL, O'Donnell E, West SL, Williams NI.
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Feb; 25(2):491-503. PubMed ID: 19945961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Evaluation of the Lady Free Biotester in determining the fertile period.
    Fehring RJ, Gaska N.
    Contraception; 1998 May; 57(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 9673839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. [The 1st phase of a prospective study of the effectiveness of natural family planning conducted in French-speaking Belgium].
    De Leizaola MA.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994 May; 23(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 8051361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Estimated maximum failure rates of cycle monitors using daily conception probabilities in the menstrual cycle.
    Freundl G, Godehardt E, Kern PA, Frank-Herrmann P, Koubenec HJ, Gnoth Ch.
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Dec; 18(12):2628-33. PubMed ID: 14645183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Natural family planning and sex selection: fact or fiction?
    Gray RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 165(6 Pt 2):1982-4. PubMed ID: 1836712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. The validation of the Billings ovulation method by laboratory research and field trials.
    Billings JJ.
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1991 Dec; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 1746210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Self-palpation to assess cervical changes in relation to mucus and temperature.
    Parenteau-Carreau S, Infante-Rivard C.
    Int J Fertil; 1988 Dec; 33 Suppl():10-6. PubMed ID: 2902020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Natural family planning in 1985: a status report.
    Spieler J, Shuler A.
    Popul Today; 1985 May; 13(5):3, 9. PubMed ID: 12280130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Side of ovulation and cycle characteristics in normally fertile women.
    Ecochard R, Gougeon A.
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Apr; 15(4):752-5. PubMed ID: 10739814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Natural family planning effectiveness in Belgium.
    De Leizaola-Cordonnier A.
    Adv Contracept; 1995 Jun; 11(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 7491857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Pilot observational prospective cohort study on the use of a novel home-based urinary pregnanediol 3-glucuronide (PDG) test to confirm ovulation when used as adjunct to fertility awareness methods (FAMs) stage 1.
    Leiva R, McNamara-Kilian M, Niezgoda H, Ecochard R, Bouchard T.
    BMJ Open; 2019 May 27; 9(5):e028496. PubMed ID: 31133596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. A prototype for ovulation detection: pros and cons.
    Lasley BL, Shideler SE, Munro CJ.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec 27; 165(6 Pt 2):2003-7. PubMed ID: 1755459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.