These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
111 related items for PubMed ID: 17555182
1. Influence of beveling and ultrasound application on marginal adaptation of box-only Class II (slot) resin composite restorations. Schmidlin PR, Wolleb K, Imfeld T, Gygax M, Lussi A. Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 17555182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical margin integrity of Class II resin composite restorations in laser- and bur-prepared cavities using three different adhesive systems. Oskoee PA, Kimyai S, Ebrahimi Chaharom ME, Rikhtegaran S, Pournaghi-Azar F. Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 22313277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization". Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Märkl A. Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro. Hofmann N, Hunecke A. Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of various grit burs on marginal integrity of resin composite restorations. Nishimura K, Ikeda M, Yoshikawa T, Otsuki M, Tagami J. J Med Dent Sci; 2005 Mar; 52(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15868736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Ebert J, Lohbauer U, Käppel S, ten Weges S, Petschelt A. Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations. Souza-Junior EJ, Prieto LT, Araújo CT, Paulillo LA. Oper Dent; 2012 Feb; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, Holz J. Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 7568723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations. Hoelscher DC, Gregory WA, Linger JB, Pink FE. Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD restorations: influence of restorative technique, bevel preparation and water storage. Coelho-De-Souza FH, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Oper Dent; 2008 Aug; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 18335731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of light curing units on marginal adaptation and hardness of Class II composite resin restorations. Cavalcante LM, Peris AR, Silikas N, Pimenta LA. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov 01; 8(7):38-45. PubMed ID: 17994153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV, Wilson NH. Quintessence Int; 2000 May 01; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]