These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


95 related items for PubMed ID: 17556729

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise vs maximum advancement.
    Hägg U, Rabie AB, Bendeus M, Wong RW, Wey MC, Du X, Peng J.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 18929270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Rodrigues de Almeida M, de Oliveira JN.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Treatment and posttreatment changes with combined headgear therapy.
    Tortop T, Yüksel S.
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):857-63. PubMed ID: 17685765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Class II: a comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliances.
    Oztürk Y, Tankuter N.
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Apr; 16(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 8005202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ, Henriques JF, Janson G, Pereira SC, Neves LS, Cançado RH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB, Halazonetis DJ, Sifakakis IB.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C, McGorray SP, Brazeau L, King GJ, Wheeler TT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.