These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

895 related items for PubMed ID: 17559537

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D, Berg JC.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC, Grosko ML, Raj M, Ryan TN, Johnston WM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000 Jun; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
    Lawson NC, Cakir D, Ramp L, Burgess JO.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F, Axmann D, Geis-Gerstorfer J.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Erkut S, Can G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials.
    Balkenhol M, Haunschild S, Erbe C, Wöstmann B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 20416412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of salivary films on the surface properties of elastomeric impression materials.
    Vassilakos N, Fernandes CP.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Sep; 2(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8180615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Correlation of impression removal force with elastomeric impression material rigidity and hardness.
    Walker MP, Alderman N, Petrie CS, Melander J, McGuire J.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 23387301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 45.