These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

306 related items for PubMed ID: 17562319

  • 1. Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction.
    Lin MS, Fawzi NL, Head-Gordon T.
    Structure; 2007 Jun; 15(6):727-40. PubMed ID: 17562319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK, Gallicchio E, Wallqvist A, Levy RM.
    Proteins; 2002 Aug 01; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.
    Dominy BN, Brooks CL.
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan 15; 23(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 11913380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: explicit vs. implicit solvent.
    Zhou R.
    Proteins; 2003 Nov 01; 53(2):148-61. PubMed ID: 14517967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.
    Tsai J, Bonneau R, Morozov AV, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D.
    Proteins; 2003 Oct 01; 53(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 12945051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
    Hsieh MJ, Luo R.
    Proteins; 2004 Aug 15; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J, Zhu Q, Shi Y, Liu H.
    Proteins; 2003 Sep 01; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model.
    Lee MC, Duan Y.
    Proteins; 2004 May 15; 55(3):620-34. PubMed ID: 15103626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
    Pearlman DA, Rao BG, Charifson P.
    Proteins; 2008 May 15; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale AMBER benchmarking.
    Wroblewska L, Skolnick J.
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Sep 15; 28(12):2059-66. PubMed ID: 17407093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Distance dependent centroid to centroid force fields using high resolution decoys.
    Rajgaria R, McAllister SR, Floudas CA.
    Proteins; 2008 Feb 15; 70(3):950-70. PubMed ID: 17847088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A theoretical analysis on hydration thermodynamics of proteins.
    Imai T, Harano Y, Kinoshita M, Kovalenko A, Hirata F.
    J Chem Phys; 2006 Jul 14; 125(2):24911. PubMed ID: 16848615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.