These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

755 related items for PubMed ID: 17566692

  • 1. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.
    Araújo C, Silva JP, Antunes P, Fernandes JM, Dias C, Pereira H, Dias T, Fougo JL.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 17566692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Long-term complications in totally implantable venous access devices: randomized study comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein puncture.
    Ribeiro RC, Abib SC, Aguiar AS, Schettini ST.
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2012 Feb; 58(2):274-7. PubMed ID: 21674765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Modification of approach for totally implantable venous access device decreases rate of complications.
    Karanlik H, Kurul S.
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep 01; 100(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 19582820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
    Hoareau-Gruchet F, Rtail R, Sulaj H, Khirnetkina A, Reyt E, Righini CA.
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr 01; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
    Di Carlo I, Barbagallo F, Toro A, Sofia M, Lombardo R, Cordio S.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul 01; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
    Capaccioli L, Nistri M, Distante V, Rontini M, Manetti A, Stecco A.
    Radiol Med; 1998 Oct 01; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
    D'Angelo F, Ramacciato G, Caramitti A, Aurello P, Lauro S, Bordin F, Della Casa U.
    Minerva Chir; 1997 Oct 01; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An alternative central venous route for cardiac surgery: supraclavicular subclavian vein catheterization.
    Kocum A, Sener M, Calıskan E, Bozdogan N, Atalay H, Aribogan A.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec 01; 25(6):1018-23. PubMed ID: 21474338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Subclavian vein stenosis following totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implant by percutaneous approach. Case report.
    Di Carlo I, Fasone MA, Toro A, Castello G, Sparatore F, Cordio S.
    G Chir; 2004 Dec 01; 25(11-12):417-9. PubMed ID: 15803820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of catheter-related infection and tip colonization between internal jugular and subclavian central venous catheters in surgical neonates.
    Breschan C, Platzer M, Jost R, Schaumberger F, Stettner H, Likar R.
    Anesthesiology; 2007 Dec 01; 107(6):946-53. PubMed ID: 18043063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Safety and effectiveness of central vein catheters indwelling with subcutaneous port in patients undergoing chemotherapy].
    Ge F, Cang J, Xue ZG.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug 26; 88(33):2331-4. PubMed ID: 19087693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters.
    Lorente L, Henry C, Martín MM, Jiménez A, Mora ML.
    Crit Care; 2005 Aug 26; 9(6):R631-5. PubMed ID: 16280064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts.
    Unal AE, Bayar S, Arat M, Ilhan O.
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2003 Feb 26; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 12620263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Pulmonary artery catheterization: a prospective study of internal jugular and subclavian approaches.
    Senagore A, Waller JD, Bonnell BW, Bursch LR, Scholten DJ.
    Crit Care Med; 1987 Jan 26; 15(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 3539524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A modified internal jugular vein access for long-term catheter placement in cancer patients.
    Pires e Albuquerque M.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb 26; 14(2):937-41. PubMed ID: 17103072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Long-term central venous catheters: size and location do matter.
    Onders RP, Shenk RR, Stellato TA.
    Am J Surg; 2006 Mar 26; 191(3):396-9. PubMed ID: 16490554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports.
    Hsu CC, Kwan GN, Evans-Barns H, Rophael JA, van Driel ML.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug 21; 2016(8):CD008942. PubMed ID: 27544827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Totally implantable venous access port systems and risk factors for complications: a one-year prospective study in a cancer centre.
    Narducci F, Jean-Laurent M, Boulanger L, El Bédoui S, Mallet Y, Houpeau JL, Hamdani A, Penel N, Fournier C.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct 21; 37(10):913-8. PubMed ID: 21831566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. External jugular Groshong catheter is associated with fewer complications than a subclavian Argyle catheter.
    Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Horie T, Furihata M, Nakagawa A, Kubota K.
    Eur Surg Res; 2008 Oct 21; 40(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 17998779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
    Chen PT, Sung CS, Wang CC, Chan KH, Chang WK, Hsu WH.
    J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec 21; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 38.