These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1097 related items for PubMed ID: 17568418
1. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro. Nicholls RL, Schirm AC, Jeffcote BO, Kuster MS. J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1506-12. PubMed ID: 17568418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [In vitro investigation of posterior cruciate ligament strain following total knee arthroplasty]. Siebel T, Käfer W. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006 Nov; 144(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 16625446 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Knee kinematics in genesis total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of different tibial designs with and without posterior cruciate substitution in cadaveric specimens. Incavo SJ, Beynnon BD, Johnson CC, Churchill DL. Am J Knee Surg; 1997 Jun; 10(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 9421596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of post-cam design of posterior stabilized knee prosthesis on tibiofemoral motion during high knee flexion. Lin KJ, Huang CH, Liu YL, Chen WC, Chang TW, Yang CT, Lai YS, Cheng CK. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2011 Oct; 26(8):847-52. PubMed ID: 21546143 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo kinematic analysis of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing knee prosthesis in deep knee bending motion. Tamaki M, Tomita T, Watanabe T, Yamazaki T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):972-8. PubMed ID: 19033084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of increased posterior tibial slope or partial posterior cruciate ligament release on knee kinematics of total knee arthroplasty]. Wang XF, Chen BC, Shi CX, Gao SJ, Shao DC, Li T, Lu B, Chen JQ. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jun 15; 45(12):839-42. PubMed ID: 17845788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical technique differences between posterior-substituting and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Sierra RJ, Berry DJ. J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct 15; 23(7 Suppl):20-3. PubMed ID: 18701240 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting the impingement angle of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements: a laboratory study. Walker PS, Yildirim G, Sussman-Fort J, Roth J, White B, Klein GR. J Arthroplasty; 2007 Aug 15; 22(5):745-52. PubMed ID: 17689786 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs. Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S, Hurschler C, Wirth CJ. Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec 15; 73(6):638-46. PubMed ID: 12553510 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving maximum flexion with a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: a fluoroscopic study. Ginsel BL, Banks S, Verdonschot N, Hodge WA. Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Dec 15; 75(6):801-7. PubMed ID: 20166363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A kinematic comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing knee replacements. Delport HP, Banks SA, De Schepper J, Bellemans J. J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug 15; 88(8):1016-21. PubMed ID: 16877599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of posterior cruciate ligament retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty. Zelle J, Van der Zanden AC, De Waal Malefijt M, Verdonschot N. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Dec 15; 24(10):842-9. PubMed ID: 19733944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]