These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


292 related items for PubMed ID: 17572117

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of mortality prediction models after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Hadjianastassiou VG, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Muktadir A, Young JD, Hands LJ.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 May; 33(5):536-43. PubMed ID: 17196847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prognostic scoring in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective evaluation.
    Tambyraja AL, Lee AJ, Murie JA, Chalmers RT.
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Feb; 47(2):282-6. PubMed ID: 18241750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Physiological comparison of open and endovascular aneurysm repair.
    Treharne GD, Thompson MM, Whiteley MS, Bell PR.
    Br J Surg; 1999 Jun; 86(6):760-4. PubMed ID: 10383575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of POSSUM scoring and the Hardman Index in selection of patients for repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Neary WD, Crow P, Foy C, Prytherch D, Heather BP, Earnshaw JJ.
    Br J Surg; 2003 Apr; 90(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 12673742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.
    Kumar P, Rodrigues GS.
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2009 Jan; 15(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 19130334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Scoring systems do not accurately predict outcome following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Sandford RM, Bown MJ, Sayers RD.
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Apr; 77(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 17388836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. External validity of a mortality prediction model in patients after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using multi-level methodology.
    Hadjianastassiou VG, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Muktadir A, Young JD, Hands LJ.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Nov; 34(5):514-21. PubMed ID: 17681832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Validation of risk assessment scoring systems for an audit of elective surgery for gastrointestinal cancer in elderly patients: an audit.
    Wakabayashi H, Sano T, Yachida S, Okano K, Izuishi K, Suzuki Y.
    Int J Surg; 2007 Oct; 5(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 17462968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Overnight intensive recovery: elective open aortic surgery without a routine ICU bed.
    Callaghan CJ, Lynch AG, Amin I, Fazel M, Lindop MJ, Gaunt ME, Varty K.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2005 Sep; 30(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 16061164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.