These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


788 related items for PubMed ID: 17586056

  • 1. Is psychological status a determinant of speech perception outcomes in highly selected good adolescent cochlear implant users?
    Yucel E, Sennaroglu G.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1415-22. PubMed ID: 17586056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
    Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Roland JT.
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.
    Higgins MB, McCleary EA, Carney AE, Schulte L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 12598813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ, Snik AF, Vermeulen AM, Cremers CW, Mylanus EA.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E, Sennaroglu G, Belgin E.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The influence of residual high-frequency hearing on the outcome in congenitally deaf cochlear implant recipients.
    Kuo SC, Gibson WP.
    Am J Otol; 2000 Sep; 21(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 10993454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Long-term speech perception in children with cochlear implants compared with children with conventional hearing aids.
    Snik AF, Vermeulen AM, Brokx JP, van den Broek P.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S129-30. PubMed ID: 9391631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ, Skinner MW, Martin LF, Holden LK, Galvin KL, Holden TA, Whitford L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A, Brenner C, Davidson L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cochlear implantation in deaf children with associated disabilities: challenges and outcomes.
    Berrettini S, Forli F, Genovese E, Santarelli R, Arslan E, Chilosi AM, Cipriani P.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):199-208. PubMed ID: 18389416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The influence of potentially limiting factors on paediatric outcomes following cochlear implantation.
    Vlahović S, Sindija B.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 68(9):1167-74. PubMed ID: 15302147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Outcomes for cochlear implant users with significant residual hearing: implications for selection criteria in children.
    Dowell RC, Hollow R, Winton E.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 15148179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Adunka OF, Buss E, Clark MS, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of early cochlear implantation on the linguistic development of the deaf child.
    Artières F, Vieu A, Mondain M, Uziel A, Venail F.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):736-42. PubMed ID: 19638938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 40.