These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

589 related items for PubMed ID: 17593582

  • 1. Gonzales v. Raich: federalism as a casualty of the war on drugs.
    Somin I.
    Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2006; 15(3):507-50. PubMed ID: 17593582
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Medical marijuana, American federalism, and the Supreme Court.
    Gostin LO.
    JAMA; 2005 Aug 17; 294(7):842-4. PubMed ID: 16106011
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clearing the air: what the latest Supreme Court decision regarding medical marijuana really means.
    Aggarwal S, Carter GT, Steinborn JJ.
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2005 Aug 17; 22(5):327-9. PubMed ID: 16225351
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Gonzales v. Raich. In the Supreme Court of the United States.
    Bostrom BA.
    Issues Law Med; 2005 Aug 17; 21(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 16173504
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Garden State just got greener: New Jersey is the fourteenth state in the nation to legalize medical marijuana.
    Brown M.
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2011 Aug 17; 41(4):1519-67. PubMed ID: 22368811
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Medical marijuana and personal autonomy.
    Boyd AJ.
    John Marshall Law Rev; 2004 Aug 17; 37(4):1253-88. PubMed ID: 16506343
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ashcroft v. Raich background.
    Laughlin C.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005 Aug 17; 33(2):396-9. PubMed ID: 16083100
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Gonzales v Raich: the US supreme court's consideration captured the public policy debate about the medical use of marijuana.
    Lorber L.
    Gend Med; 2005 Sep 17; 2(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 16290884
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Jumping frogs, endangered toads, and California's medical-marijuana law.
    Annas GJ.
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Nov 24; 353(21):2291-6. PubMed ID: 16306529
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Gonzales v. Oregon and the politics of medicine.
    Lindsay RA.
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2006 Mar 24; 16(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 16770893
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Additional considerations.
    Nadelmann E, Gutwillig S, Davies J.
    Addiction; 2012 May 24; 107(5):873-5. PubMed ID: 22471566
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.