These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


561 related items for PubMed ID: 17594848

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Peers review, editors decide, and then, what?
    Schachat AP.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):677-8. PubMed ID: 17386274
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of biomedical publications from Iran, Pakistan and Egypt through their impact factor.
    Ghaleh NR, Siadat F, Azizi F.
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2004 Oct; 54(10):528-9. PubMed ID: 15552289
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [The profit roundabout].
    Haug C.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 May 03; 127(9):1173. PubMed ID: 17479129
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Subspecialty impact factors: the contribution of pediatric anesthesia and pain articles.
    Ramsdell R, Lerman J, Pickhardt D, Feldman D, Foster J, Houle TT.
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan 03; 108(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19095837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The impact of the impact factor on publication in critical care nursing.
    Egerod I.
    Nurs Crit Care; 2008 Jan 03; 13(4):184. PubMed ID: 18577169
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The delicate topic of the impact factor.
    Kirchhof B, Bornfeld N, Grehn F.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul 03; 245(7):925-7. PubMed ID: 17562062
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Bibliometric analysis of lung transplantation research articles.
    Eshraghi M, Habibi G, Rahim MB, Mirkazemi R, Ghaemi M, Omidimorad A, Alavi AA, Banazadeh M.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Mar 03; 59(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 21384307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The use and abuse of impact factors.
    Marks SC.
    Clin Anat; 2003 May 03; 16(3):282-3. PubMed ID: 12673827
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [The impact factor and editorial decisions].
    Matías-Guiu J, García-Ramos R.
    Neurologia; 2008 May 03; 23(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 18597189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature.
    The PLoS Medicine Editors.
    PLoS Med; 2006 Jun 03; 3(6):e291. PubMed ID: 16749869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Citation and scientific searching databases and impact factor as a tool for evaluation of scientific level of the publication].
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Aug 03; 77(4):263-5. PubMed ID: 21128374
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Assessment of publication output in the field of general practice and family medicine and by general practitioners and general practice institutions.
    Jelercic S, Lingard H, Spiegel W, Pichlhöfer O, Maier M.
    Fam Pract; 2010 Oct 03; 27(5):582-9. PubMed ID: 20554654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Multi-authors' self-citation: a further impact factor bias?
    Sala SD, Brooks J.
    Cortex; 2008 Oct 03; 44(9):1139-45. PubMed ID: 18708185
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.