These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
115 related items for PubMed ID: 17602906
1. Wireless pH monitoring: better tolerability and lower impact on daily habits. Grigolon A, Bravi I, Cantù P, Conte D, Penagini R. Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Aug; 39(8):720-4. PubMed ID: 17602906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient acceptance and clinical impact of Bravo monitoring in patients with previous failed catheter-based studies. Sweis R, Fox M, Anggiansah R, Anggiansah A, Basavaraju K, Canavan R, Wong T. Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Mar 15; 29(6):669-76. PubMed ID: 19183144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the impact of wireless versus catheter-based pH-metry on daily activities and study-related symptoms. Bradley AG, Crowell MD, DiBaise JK, Kim HJ, Burdick GE, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK. J Clin Gastroenterol; 2011 Feb 15; 45(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 20679906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility and tolerability of transnasal/per-oral placement of the wireless pH capsule vs. traditional 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring--a randomized trial. Wong WM, Bautista J, Dekel R, Malagon IB, Tuchinsky I, Green C, Dickman R, Esquivel R, Fass R. Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Jan 15; 21(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 15679765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring. Chander B, Hanley-Williams N, Deng Y, Sheth A. J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar 15; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of wireless 48-h (Bravo) versus traditional ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. Håkanson BS, Berggren P, Granqvist S, Ljungqvist O, Thorell A. Scand J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar 15; 44(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 19040176 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of prolonged pH measurements on the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: 4-day wireless pH studies. Scarpulla G, Camilleri S, Galante P, Manganaro M, Fox M. Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Dec 15; 102(12):2642-7. PubMed ID: 17850412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)]. Mönkemüller K, Neumann H, Fry LC, Kolfenbach S, Malfertheiner P. Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr 15; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of data obtained from sedated versus unsedated wireless telemetry capsule placement: does sedation affect the results of ambulatory 48-hour pH testing? Belafsky PC, Godin DA, Garcia JC, Rahim N. Laryngoscope; 2005 Jun 15; 115(6):1109-13. PubMed ID: 15933532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic yield of 96-h wireless pH monitoring and usefulness in patients' management. Grigolon A, Consonni D, Bravi I, Tenca A, Penagini R. Scand J Gastroenterol; 2011 May 15; 46(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 21366495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure. Marchese M, Spada C, Iacopini F, Familiari P, Shah SG, Tringali A, Costamagna G. Endoscopy; 2006 Aug 15; 38(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 17001571 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]