These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

2508 related items for PubMed ID: 17608736

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
    Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Zafiropoulos GG, Andreana S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 9796144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface.
    Ferguson SJ, Broggini N, Wieland M, de Wild M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, Buser D.
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Aug; 78(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 16637025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae.
    Gahlert M, Roehling S, Sprecher CM, Kniha H, Milz S, Bormann K.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 21806681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants: a histological and histomorphometrical study in the maxilla of pigs.
    Gahlert M, Röhling S, Wieland M, Sprecher CM, Kniha H, Milz S.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1247-53. PubMed ID: 19531104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
    Ferguson SJ, Langhoff JD, Voelter K, von Rechenberg B, Scharnweber D, Bierbaum S, Schnabelrauch M, Kautz AR, Frauchiger VM, Mueller TL, van Lenthe GH, Schlottig F.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Nov; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs.
    Schliephake H, Hefti T, Schlottig F, Gédet P, Staedt H.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Sep; 37(9):818-28. PubMed ID: 20573183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants.
    Salem NA, Abo Taleb AL, Aboushelib MN.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig.
    Gottlow J, Dard M, Kjellson F, Obrecht M, Sennerby L.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 20586785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
    Cheng Z, Zhang F, He F, Zhang L, Guo C, Zhao S, Yang G.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A, Wang CJ, Kelly J, Gubbi P, Nishimura I.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jul; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat.
    Kohal RJ, Wolkewitz M, Hinze M, Han JS, Bächle M, Butz F.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 19298287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of a titanium implant surface conditioned by a hydroxide ion solution.
    Stadlinger B, Ferguson SJ, Eckelt U, Mai R, Lode AT, Loukota R, Schlottig F.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 50(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21177005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits.
    Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Addis A, Schupbach P, Simion M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):844-50. PubMed ID: 19604281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison study of the osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants. A biomechanical evaluation in the maxilla of pigs.
    Gahlert M, Röhling S, Wieland M, Eichhorn S, Küchenhoff H, Kniha H.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 12(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 19438936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 126.