These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1229 related items for PubMed ID: 17609610

  • 1. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J, Baker S, Caraway T, Kasulis H, Mears A, Smith J, Swim L, Wood M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Everyday Listening Performance of Children Before and After Receiving a Second Cochlear Implant: Results Using the Parent Version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.
    Galvin KL, Mok M.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Apr; 37(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 26418045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
    Kim JS, Kim LS, Jeong SW.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 19318886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, Nel E.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Can adolescents and young adults with prelingual hearing loss benefit from a second, sequential cochlear implant?
    Galvin KL, Hughes KC, Mok M.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):368-77. PubMed ID: 20180630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech detection and localization results and clinical outcomes for children receiving sequential bilateral cochlear implants before four years of age.
    Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC, Briggs RJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Oct; 47(10):636-46. PubMed ID: 18923985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR, Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Lake J.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. 12-month post-operative results for older children using sequential bilateral implants.
    Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC, Briggs RJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):19S-21S. PubMed ID: 17496639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Mok M, Galvin KL, Dowell RC, McKay CM.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010 Apr; 15(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 19468210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A, Brenner C, Davidson L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Earlier intervention leads to better sound localization in children with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Scherf F, Deggouj N, Desloovere C, Offeciers FE, Van de Heyning PH, Dhooge IJ, Wouters J.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010 Feb; 15(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 19451705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
    Fraysse B, Dillier N, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Morera Perez C, Morgon AH, Müller-Deile J, Ramos Macias A.
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech perception and localization with adults with bilateral sequential cochlear implants.
    Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Witt SA, Noble WG.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):86S-90S. PubMed ID: 17496655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 62.