These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 1761263

  • 1. [Digital luminescence radiography. Part 1: Basic principle, technical execution and clinical use].
    Döhring W, Urbach D.
    Fortschr Med; 1991 Oct 20; 109(30):610-5. PubMed ID: 1761263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Digital luminescence radiography . 2: Technical implementation and clinical application--future developments].
    Döhring W, Urbach D.
    Fortschr Med; 1991 Oct 30; 109(31):633-8. PubMed ID: 1743608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP.
    Bildgebung; 1991 Oct 30; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Digital detection systems for projection radiography].
    Schulz RF.
    Rofo; 2001 Dec 30; 173(12):1137-46. PubMed ID: 11740676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Digital radiography using light-emitting detectors. Operative principles and characteristics of images].
    Salvini E.
    Radiol Med; 1988 Dec 30; 76(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 3212237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C, Ohara H.
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec 30; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [The new possibilities of digital luminescence radiography (DLR) and digital imaging data processing for the making of field verification images].
    Zimmermann JS, Blume J, Wendhausen H, Hebbinghaus D, Kovács G, Eilf K, Schultze J, Kimmig BN.
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1995 Jun 30; 171(6):332-9. PubMed ID: 7597619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR, Davies AG, Kengyelics SM.
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec 30; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Luminescent digital radiography].
    Gurvich AM, Miagkova MG, Riudiger Iu.
    Med Tekh; 1990 Dec 30; (3):27-31. PubMed ID: 2388546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA.
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov 30; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview.
    Körner M, Weber CH, Wirth S, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser MF, Treitl M.
    Radiographics; 2007 Nov 30; 27(3):675-86. PubMed ID: 17495286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP, Eger H.
    Radiography; 1985 Nov 30; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP, Faulkner K.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov 30; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A, Gröndahl HG.
    Int Dent J; 1995 Feb 30; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A, Maggi F, Spalvieri S, Meduri A, Marano P.
    Rays; 2003 Feb 30; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR, Kengyelics SM, Davies AG.
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May 30; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM, Ordiales JM, Guibelalde E, Prieto C, Vano E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 May 30; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique].
    Krug B, Zähringer M, Lackner K.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar 30; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.