These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

658 related items for PubMed ID: 17618917

  • 1. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
    Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, Hodges JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of Effect of Implant Angulation and Implant Number on the Dimensional Accuracy of Definitive Casts.
    Kaur G, Baweja PS, Saini RS, Singh IP, Sharma T, Singh S.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr 01; 22(4):394-399. PubMed ID: 34267009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R, Shankar C, Rajan M, Baig MR, Azhagarasan NS.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Apr 01; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M, Garg P, Prithviraj DR.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr 01; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May 01; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 May 01; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J, Palmer R, Howe L, Wilson R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar 01; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Lin WS, Harris BT, Elathamna EN, Abdel-Azim T, Morton D.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015 Mar 01; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.