These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a 36-month prospective study. Liddelow G, Henry P. Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 20234886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures. Alfadda SA, Attard NJ, David LA. Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a comparative pilot study of immediate loading versus delayed loading after two years. Stephan G, Vidot F, Noharet R, Mariani P. J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S138-45. PubMed ID: 17618928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Walton JN, Glick N, Macentee MI. Int J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading. Glauser R, Zembic A, Ruhstaller P, Windisch S. J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S59-68. PubMed ID: 17618935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Payne AG, Solomons YF. Int J Prosthodont; 2000 Jun; 13(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 11203640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Visser A, Vissink A. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare. Visser A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Int J Prosthodont; 2006 Jul; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible. Gallucci GO, Doughtie CB, Hwang JW, Fiorellini JP, Weber HP. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study. Krennmair G, Weinländer M, Krainhöfner M, Piehslinger E. Int J Prosthodont; 2006 Jun; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study. ELsyad MA. Int J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. Bakke M, Holm B, Gotfredsen K. Int J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets. Ellis JS, Burawi G, Walls A, Thomason JM. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]