These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
184 related items for PubMed ID: 17620025
21. Ontogeny of orientation and spatial learning on the radial maze in mice. Chapillon P, Roullet P, Lassalle JM. Dev Psychobiol; 1995 Dec; 28(8):429-42. PubMed ID: 8582531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Memory without awareness: pigeons do not show metamemory in delayed matching to sample. Sutton JE, Shettleworth SJ. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):266-82. PubMed ID: 18426309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight duration samples in pigeons. Grant DS. Behav Processes; 2006 May 01; 72(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 16481126 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Radial Maze Analog for Pigeons: Evidence for Flexible Coding Strategies May Result from Faulty Assumptions. Gipson CD, Digian KA, Miller HC, Zentall TR. Learn Motiv; 2008 Nov 01; 39(4):285-295. PubMed ID: 19884963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Evidence for detection of one duration sample and default responding to other duration samples by pigeons may result from an artifact of retention-test ambiguity. Zentall TR, Klein ED, Singer RA. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Apr 01; 30(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15078122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Distinction between places and paths in rats' spatial representations. Brown SW, Mellgren RL. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Jan 01; 20(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 8308489 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons. Roberts WA, Kraemer PJ. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1982 Oct 01; 8(4):342-53. PubMed ID: 7175446 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. How do pigeons represent numbers? Studies of number scale bisection. Roberts WA. Behav Processes; 2005 Apr 29; 69(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 15795068 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Acquisition versus steady state in the time-left experiment. Machado A, Vasconcelos M. Behav Processes; 2006 Feb 28; 71(2-3):172-87. PubMed ID: 16343806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Pigeons' spatial memory: III. Effect of distractors on delayed matching of key location. Wilkie DM. J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep 28; 40(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 6631313 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A new learning paradigm elicits fast visual discrimination in pigeons. Huber L, Apfalter W, Steurer M, Prossinger H. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Apr 28; 31(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 15839779 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Pigeons discriminate continuous versus discontinuous line segments. Kirkpatrick K, Wilkinson A, Johnston S. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jul 28; 33(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 17620026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Species differences in spatial memory among Clark's nutcrackers, scrub jays, and pigeons. Olson DJ. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1991 Oct 28; 17(4):363-76. PubMed ID: 1744593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Interpreting visual preferences in the visual paired-comparison task. Richmond J, Colombo M, Hayne H. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep 28; 33(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 17723062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]