These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


702 related items for PubMed ID: 17632758

  • 1. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
    Duarte GM, Cabello C, Torresan RZ, Alvarenga M, Telles GH, Bianchessi ST, Caserta N, Segala SR, de Lima Mda C, Etchebehere EC, Camargo EE, Tinois E.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI.
    Sommer H, Tiling R, Pechmann M, Kindermann G, Kress K, Moser R, Tatsch K, Hahn K, Pfluger T, Assemi C.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997 Oct; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
    Wallace AM, Daniel BL, Jeffrey SS, Birdwell RL, Nowels KW, Dirbas FM, Schraedley-Desmond P, Ikeda DM.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.
    Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, Colpaert C, Schelfhout AM, Leyman P, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Van Den Haute J, Gillardin JP, Tjalma W, Van Der Auwera JC, Buytaert P, De Schepper A.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Jun; 30(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 15135477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A new contrast in MR mammography by means of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary results.
    Schmitt B, Zamecnik P, Zaiss M, Rerich E, Schuster L, Bachert P, Schlemmer HP.
    Rofo; 2011 Nov; 183(11):1030-6. PubMed ID: 22034086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA, Stockamp C, Maderwald S, Mühler A, Kimmig R, Jaeger H, Barkhausen J, Forsting M.
    Clin Imaging; 2006 Nov; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery.
    Howarth D, Slater S, Lau P, Booker J, Clark D, Sillar R.
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. MRI versus ultrasonography and mammography for preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Wasif N, Garreau J, Terando A, Kirsch D, Mund DF, Giuliano AE.
    Am Surg; 2009 Oct; 75(10):970-5. PubMed ID: 19886147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Potential of MR mammography to predict tumor grading of invasive breast cancer.
    Dietzel M, Baltzer PA, Vag T, Zoubi R, Gröschel T, Burmeister H, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA.
    Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):826-33. PubMed ID: 21442559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Ductal pattern enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging of the breast due to ductal lavage.
    Ghanouni P, Kurian AW, Margolis D, Hartman AR, Mills MA, Plevritis SK, Ford JM, Daniel BL.
    Breast J; 2007 Sep; 13(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17461903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fusion of MRI and sonography image for breast cancer evaluation using real-time virtual sonography with magnetic navigation: first experience.
    Nakano S, Yoshida M, Fujii K, Yorozuya K, Mouri Y, Kousaka J, Fukutomi T, Kimura J, Ishiguchi T, Ohno K, Mizumoto T, Harao M.
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Sep; 39(9):552-9. PubMed ID: 19654132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging.
    Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG, O'Dell CA, Brekke CE.
    Am J Surg; 2008 Sep; 196(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18436185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, Thickman D, Hylton N, Warner E, Pisano E, Schnitt SJ, Gatsonis C, Schnall M, DeAngelis GA, Stomper P, Rosen EL, O'Loughlin M, Harms S, Bluemke DA, International Breast MRI Consortium Working Group.
    Cancer; 2005 May 01; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dynamic enhanced MRI predicts chemosensitivity in breast cancer patients.
    Nagashima T, Sakakibara M, Nakamura R, Arai M, Kadowaki M, Kazama T, Nakatani Y, Koda K, Miyazaki M.
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Nov 01; 60(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 16926079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging identifies multifocal and multicentric disease in breast cancer patients who are eligible for partial breast irradiation.
    Al-Hallaq HA, Mell LK, Bradley JA, Chen LF, Ali AN, Weichselbaum RR, Newstead GM, Chmura SJ.
    Cancer; 2008 Nov 01; 113(9):2408-14. PubMed ID: 18823018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Can magnetic resonance imaging be used to select patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy in prophylactic mastectomy?
    McLaughlin SA, Stempel M, Morris EA, Liberman L, King TA.
    Cancer; 2008 Mar 15; 112(6):1214-21. PubMed ID: 18257089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, Dominelli V, Cagioli S, Karatasiou A, Pronio A, Kirchin MA, Passariello R.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul 15; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.