These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


418 related items for PubMed ID: 17636668

  • 1. Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
    Power J, French R, Cowan F.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul 18; 2007(3):CD001326. PubMed ID: 17636668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Subdermal contraceptive implants.
    Peralta O, Diaz S, Croxatto H.
    J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 1995 Jun 18; 53(1-6):223-6. PubMed ID: 7626459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
    French R, Van Vliet H, Cowan F, Mansour D, Morris S, Hughes D, Robinson A, Proctor T, Summerbell C, Logan S, Helmerhorst F, Guillebaud J.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004 Jun 18; 2004(3):CD001776. PubMed ID: 15266453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs), versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
    French R, Cowan F, Mansour D, Morris S, Hughes D, Robinson A, Proctor T, Summerbell C, Logan S, Guillebaud J.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001 Jun 18; (2):CD001776. PubMed ID: 11406007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Hormonal implants: contraception for a new century.
    Darney PD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May 18; 170(5 Pt 2):1536-43. PubMed ID: 8178903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized multicenter study comparing the efficacy and bleeding pattern of a single-rod (Implanon) and a six-capsule (Norplant) hormonal contraceptive implant.
    Zheng SR, Zheng HM, Qian SZ, Sang GW, Kaper RF.
    Contraception; 1999 Jul 18; 60(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10549446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
    Kirkman RJ, Bromham DR, O'Connor TP, Sahota JE.
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul 18; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.
    Chompootaweep S, Kochagarn E, Sirisumpan S, Tang-usaha J, Theppitaksak B, Dusitsin N.
    Contraception; 1996 Jan 18; 53(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8631187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Norplant implants in the UK: first year continuation and removals.
    Peers T, Stevens JE, Graham J, Davey A.
    Contraception; 1996 Jun 18; 53(6):345-51. PubMed ID: 8773421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
    Akhter H, Dunson TR, Amatya RN, Begum K, Chowdhury T, Dighe N, Krueger SL, Rahman S.
    Contraception; 1993 Jun 18; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.
    Sivin I, Campodonico I, Kiriwat O, Holma P, Diaz S, Wan L, Biswas A, Viegas O, el din Abdalla K, Anant MP, Pavez M, Stern J.
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Dec 18; 13(12):3371-8. PubMed ID: 9886517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A 3-year multicentre randomized controlled trial of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants, with non-randomized matched copper-intrauterine device controls.
    Bahamondes L, Brache V, Meirik O, Ali M, Habib N, Landoulsi S, WHO Study Group on Contraceptive Implants for Women.
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov 18; 30(11):2527-38. PubMed ID: 26409014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
    Fleming D, Davie J, Glasier A.
    Contraception; 1998 Jan 18; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Norplant-2 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
    Lee TY, Yang YS, Tseng LH, Ko TM, Hsu MC, Chuang SM.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 May 18; 92(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 8104598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Risks and benefits, advantages and disadvantages of levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.
    Sivin I.
    Drug Saf; 2003 May 18; 26(5):303-35. PubMed ID: 12650633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability.
    Coukell AJ, Balfour JA.
    Drugs; 1998 Jun 18; 55(6):861-87. PubMed ID: 9617600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Contraceptive implants.
    Ladipo O, Coutinho EM.
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec 18; 6(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 7893965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Experience of Thai women in Bangkok with Norplant-2 implants.
    Chompootaweep S, Kochagarn E, Tang-Usaha J, Theppitaksak B, Dusitsin N.
    Contraception; 1998 Oct 18; 58(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 9866003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Phase III clinical trial with Norplant II (two covered rods): report on five years of use.
    Contraception; 1993 Aug 18; 48(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 8403909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.