These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


133 related items for PubMed ID: 17640798

  • 1. Usefulness of silicone elastomer sheet as another option of adhesion preventive material during craniectomies.
    Lee CH, Cho DS, Jin SC, Kim SH, Park DB.
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2007 Oct; 109(8):667-71. PubMed ID: 17640798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of polytetrafluoroethylene dural substitute as adhesion preventive material during craniectomies.
    Vakis A, Koutentakis D, Karabetsos D, Kalostos G.
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2006 Dec; 108(8):798-802. PubMed ID: 16368186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Placement of silicone sheeting at decompressive craniectomy to prevent adhesions at cranioplasty.
    Bulters D, Belli A.
    Br J Neurosurg; 2010 Feb; 24(1):75-6. PubMed ID: 20158357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Analysis of Decompressive Craniectomies with Subsequent Cranioplasties in the Presence of Collagen Matrix Dural Substitute and Polytetrafluoroethylene as an Adhesion Preventative Material.
    Pierson M, Birinyi PV, Bhimireddy S, Coppens JR.
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Feb; 86():153-60. PubMed ID: 26433096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Safety of the nonabsorbable dural substitute in decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury.
    Huang YH, Lee TC, Chen WF, Wang YM.
    J Trauma; 2011 Sep; 71(3):533-7. PubMed ID: 21768912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Waterjet dissection in pediatric cranioplasty.
    Tschan CA, Hermann EJ, Wagner W, Krauss JK, Oertel JM.
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2010 Mar; 5(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 20192640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Rationale Behind the Use of Double-Layer Polypropylene Patch (G-patch) Dural Substitute During Decompressive Craniectomy as an Adhesion Preventive Material for Subsequent Cranioplasty with Special Reference to Flap Elevation Time.
    Pathrose Kamalabai R, Nagar M, Chandran R, Mohammed Haneefa Suharanbeevi S, Bhanu Prabhakar R, Peethambaran A, Mallika Dhanapalan S, Jain S, Sharma S.
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e105-e112. PubMed ID: 29233748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Silicone Elastomer Sheet during Decompressive Craniectomy: Anti-Adhesive Role in Cranioplasty.
    Kim YH, Lee CH, Kim CH, Son DW, Lee SW, Song GS, Sung SK.
    Brain Sci; 2021 Jan 18; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 33477608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of mitomycin C as fibrosis preventive agent during craniectomies.
    Cemil B, Tun K, Kaptanoglu E, Cevirgen B, Gurcay AG, Kaymaz F, Tekdemir I.
    Br J Neurosurg; 2009 Jun 18; 23(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 19533464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Epidural Bovine Pericardium Facilitates Dissection During Cranioplasty: A Technical Note.
    Griessenauer CJ, He L, Salem M, Chua M, Ogilvy CS, Thomas AJ.
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Dec 18; 84(6):2059-63. PubMed ID: 26283487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Decompressive craniectomy using gelatin film and future bone flap replacement.
    Oladunjoye AO, Schrot RJ, Zwienenberg-Lee M, Muizelaar JP, Shahlaie K.
    J Neurosurg; 2013 Apr 18; 118(4):776-82. PubMed ID: 23394343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Analysis of the factors influencing bone graft infection after cranioplasty.
    Lee CH, Chung YS, Lee SH, Yang HJ, Son YJ.
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Jul 18; 73(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 22743392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Long-term outcome of subcutaneously preserved autologous cranioplasty.
    Shoakazemi A, Flannery T, McConnell RS.
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Sep 18; 65(3):505-10; discussion 510. PubMed ID: 19687696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Acute autologous bone flap infection after cranioplasty for postinjury decompressive craniectomy.
    Huang YH, Yang TM, Lee TC, Chen WF, Yang KY.
    Injury; 2013 Jan 18; 44(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22154044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Outcome after decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury.
    Howard JL, Cipolle MD, Anderson M, Sabella V, Shollenberger D, Li PM, Pasquale MD.
    J Trauma; 2008 Aug 18; 65(2):380-5; discussion 385-6. PubMed ID: 18695475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy--analysis of 300 cases (author's transl)].
    Yamaura A, Sato M, Meguro K, Nakamura T, Uemura K.
    No Shinkei Geka; 1977 Apr 18; 5(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 558536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Predictors of cranioplasty complications in stroke and trauma patients.
    Walcott BP, Kwon CS, Sheth SA, Fehnel CR, Koffie RM, Asaad WF, Nahed BV, Coumans JV.
    J Neurosurg; 2013 Apr 18; 118(4):757-62. PubMed ID: 23394335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Technique for decompressive craniectomy using Seprafilm as a dural substitute and anti-adhesion barrier.
    Mumert ML, Altay T, Couldwell WT.
    J Clin Neurosci; 2012 Mar 18; 19(3):455-7. PubMed ID: 22245275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane use in emergent craniectomies shows minimal dural adhesions.
    Endicott L, Ehresman J, Tettelbach W, Forsyth A, Lee BS.
    J Wound Care; 2023 Oct 02; 32(10):634-640. PubMed ID: 37830838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Collagen-only biomatrix as a novel dural substitute. Examination of the efficacy, safety and outcome: clinical experience on a series of 208 patients.
    Esposito F, Cappabianca P, Fusco M, Cavallo LM, Bani GG, Biroli F, Sparano A, de Divitiis O, Signorelli A.
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2008 Apr 02; 110(4):343-51. PubMed ID: 18242823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.