These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. An evaluation of 30-km cycling time trial (TT30) pacing strategy through time-to-exhaustion at average TT30 pace. Ham DJ, Knez WL. J Strength Cond Res; 2009 May; 23(3):1016-21. PubMed ID: 19387372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An analysis of the pacing strategies adopted by elite athletes during track cycling. Corbett J. Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2009 Jun; 4(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 19567923 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Variable versus constant power strategies during cycling time-trials: prediction of time savings using an up-to-date mathematical model. Atkinson G, Peacock O, Passfield L. J Sports Sci; 2007 Jul; 25(9):1001-9. PubMed ID: 17497402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cycling performance is superior for time-to-exhaustion versus time-trial in endurance laboratory tests. Coakley SL, Passfield L. J Sports Sci; 2018 Jun; 36(11):1228-1234. PubMed ID: 28892462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of information processing between the brain and peripheral physiological systems in pacing and perception of effort. St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV, Rauch LH, Tucker R, Baden DA, Foster C, Noakes TD. Sports Med; 2006 Jun; 36(8):705-22. PubMed ID: 16869711 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]