These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
151 related items for PubMed ID: 17646039
1. Evaluation of a new semiburied curvilinear distraction device in dogs. Niu XG, Han XX. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 17646039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Segmental reconstruction of maxillary defects by arced distraction osteogenesis of zygoma]. Niu XG, Zhao YM, Han XX. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 41(9):547-8. PubMed ID: 17129428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New internal transport distraction device for reconstructing segmental defects of the mandible. Hibi H, Ueda M. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 44(5):382-5. PubMed ID: 16236405 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an internal distraction device for syndromic craniosynostosis: device selection, problems, indications, and a proposal for use of a parallel bar for device-setting. Satoh K, Mitsukawa N, Tosa Y, Kadomatsu K. J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Nov; 17(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 17119404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical controversies in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Part two. External versus internal distraction osteogenesis for the management of severe maxillary hypoplasia: external distraction. Figueroa AA, Polley JW. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2598-604. PubMed ID: 19022141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: Reconstruction of curved mandibular angle defects using a new internal transport distraction device: an experiment in goats. McLeod NM. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 47(3):247-8. PubMed ID: 19124180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary distraction using a trans-sinusal distractor: technical note. Nadjmi V, Van Erum R, Schoenaers J, Schepers E. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 14759118 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical controversies in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Part one. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis for advancement in cleft patients, internal devices. Drew SJ. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2592-7. PubMed ID: 19022140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis: maxillary and mandibular lengthening. Guerrero CA, Bell WH, Meza LS. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):111-51. PubMed ID: 11905328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis with a semiburied device. Padwa BL, Kearns GJ, Todd R, Troulis M, Mulliken JB, Kaban LB. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 28(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 10065640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiplanar and combined distraction osteogenesis for three-dimensional and functional reconstruction of unilateral large maxillary defects. Niu XG, Zhao YM, Han XX. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 47(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 18760513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical and orthodontic considerations for distraction osteogenesis with ROD appliances. Dessner S, Razdolsky Y, el-Bialy T. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):111-39. PubMed ID: 11905335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis to treat maxillary hypoplasia: comparison of an internal and an external system. Kuroda S, Araki Y, Oya S, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 15821694 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of internal maxillary distraction for maxillary hypoplasia: a preliminary report. Van Sickels JE, Madsen MJ, Cunningham LL, Bird D. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 64(12):1715-20. PubMed ID: 17113436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]