These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

287 related items for PubMed ID: 17651996

  • 1. Multifocal visual evoked potential and automated perimetry abnormalities in strabismic amblyopes.
    Greenstein VC, Eggers HM, Hood DC.
    J AAPOS; 2008 Feb; 12(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 17651996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of visual function and retinal structure in adult amblyopes.
    Pérez-Rico C, García-Romo E, Gros-Otero J, Roldán-Díaz I, Arévalo-Serrano J, Germain F, Blanco R.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 25551686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry.
    Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Winn BJ, Ohri N, Liebmann JM, Ritch R.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Feb; 45(2):492-8. PubMed ID: 14744890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique.
    Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Chu DH, Xu L, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 16865010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Multifocal VEP difference between early- and late-onset strabismus amblyopia.
    Zhang W, Zhao K.
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 110(2-3):173-80. PubMed ID: 16328925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of neutral density filters on testing in patients with strabismic amblyopia.
    Habeeb SY, Arthur BW, ten Hove MW.
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 47(4):348-50. PubMed ID: 22883843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma.
    Hood DC, Greenstein VC.
    Prog Retin Eye Res; 2003 Mar; 22(2):201-51. PubMed ID: 12604058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Electrophysiological and psychophysical differences between early- and late-onset strabismic amblyopia.
    Davis AR, Sloper JJ, Neveu MM, Hogg CR, Morgan MJ, Holder GE.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Feb; 44(2):610-7. PubMed ID: 12556390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Multifocal objective perimetry compared with Humphrey full-threshold perimetry in patients with optic neuritis.
    Pakrou N, Casson R, Kaines A, Selva D.
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 34(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 16925704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Visual evoked potentials in successfully treated strabismic amblyopes and normal subjects.
    Watts PO, Neveu MM, Holder GE, Sloper JJ.
    J AAPOS; 2002 Dec; 6(6):389-92. PubMed ID: 12506282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
    Mousa MF, Cubbidge RP, Al-Mansouri F, Bener A.
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dichoptic stimulation improves detection of glaucoma with multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Arvind H, Klistorner A, Graham S, Grigg J, Goldberg I, Klistorner A, Billson FA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4590-6. PubMed ID: 17898282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Pattern visual evoked potential and foveal sensitivity in amblyopia.
    Dahal M, Dahal HN, Gautam P, Shrestha JB, Khanal S.
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2023 Oct; 147(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 37639170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dysfunction in the fellow eyes of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopic children assessed by visually evoked potentials.
    Andrade EP, Berezovsky A, Sacai PY, Pereira JM, Rocha DM, Salomão SR.
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2016 Oct; 79(5):294-298. PubMed ID: 27982206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of amblyopic scotoma by electrophysiological examinations and computerized perimetry.
    Fioretto M, Gandolfo E, Burtolo C, Orione C, Fava GP, Calabria G, Zingirian M.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 1996 Oct; 6(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 8823598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Correlation of the multifocal visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in compressive optic neuropathies.
    Danesh-Meyer HV, Carroll SC, Gaskin BJ, Gao A, Gamble GD.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 47(4):1458-63. PubMed ID: 16565379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of multifocal visual evoked potential, standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography in assessing visual pathway in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Laron M, Cheng H, Zhang B, Schiffman JS, Tang RA, Frishman LJ.
    Mult Scler; 2010 Apr; 16(4):412-26. PubMed ID: 20207786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Jang J, Kyung SE.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug 13; 18(1):196. PubMed ID: 30103718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Multifocal visual evoked potential responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects.
    Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Chen CS, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul 13; 136(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 12834667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.