These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

269 related items for PubMed ID: 17660600

  • 21. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
    Cushing SL, Papsin BC, Gordon KA.
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1787-91. PubMed ID: 17003731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.
    McMahon CM, Patuzzi RB, Gibson WP, Sanli H.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18344874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Binaural processing in children using bilateral cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA, Valero J, Papsin BC.
    Neuroreport; 2007 Apr 16; 18(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 17413667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Zirn S, Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Wesarg T.
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct 16; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses.
    Kileny PR.
    Am J Otol; 1991 Oct 16; 12 Suppl():37-42; discussion 43-7. PubMed ID: 2069187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses after electrical stimulation with biphasic, triphasic and precision triphasic pulses.
    Bahmer A, Polak M, Baumann U.
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan 16; 259(1-2):75-85. PubMed ID: 19850116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Sparreboom M, Beynon AJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep 16; 31(7):1055-61. PubMed ID: 20418793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Reeder RM, Raulie JC.
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan 16; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Value of auditory evoked potentials of the brain stem in patients with a Digisonic cochlear implant].
    Truy E, Gallego S, Chanal JM, Collet L, Berger-Vachon C, Morgon A.
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1997 Jan 16; 114(4):116-24. PubMed ID: 9686020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Effects of lumbar epidural anesthesia on brainstem auditory response].
    Kasaba T, Nonoue T, Yanagidani T, Maeda M, Aoki S, Sakaguchi T, Kosaka Y.
    Masui; 1991 Jan 16; 40(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 2051567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
    Gordon KA, Tanaka S, Wong DD, Papsin BC.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct 16; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB, Chambers And RD, Kraus N.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec 16; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evaluation of objective test techniques in cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations.
    Cinar BC, Atas A, Sennaroglu G, Sennaroglu L.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep 16; 32(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21817941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec 16; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P, Eichele T, Buechler M, Debener S, Jäncke L, Dillier N, Hugdahl K, Meyer M.
    Brain; 2009 Jul 16; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Intraoperative test of auditory nerve function.
    Frohne C, Lesinski A, Battmer RD, Lenarz T.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov 16; 18(6 Suppl):S93-4. PubMed ID: 9391614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Auditory evoked potentials by electric stimulation of the cochlea].
    Sarfati D, Bestry C, Moatti L, Garabedian EN.
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994 Nov 16; 111(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 7645888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [An experimental study of the auditory brainstem implant in guinea pigs].
    Cao K, Shi X, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Hu K.
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1994 Dec 16; 16(6):416-9. PubMed ID: 7720137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study.
    Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Bacciu A, Guida M, Bacciu S.
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep 16; 112(9):1653-6. PubMed ID: 12352681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.