These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
128 related items for PubMed ID: 17669480
21. On the effect of an internal light conductor on the marginal integrity of class-II composite fillings. Stoll R, Gente M, Palichleb M, Stachniss V. Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 16519928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Enamel margin integrity of Class I one-bottle all-in-one adhesives-based restorations. Blunck U, Zaslansky P. J Adhes Dent; 2011 Feb; 13(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 21403933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. J Dent; 2011 Oct; 39(10):643-7. PubMed ID: 21801799 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Dye staining gap test: an alternative method for assessing marginal gap formation in composite restorations. Caroline Bruschi Alonso R, Maria Correr G, Gonçalves Cunha L, Flávia Sanches Borges A, Maria Puppin-Rontani R, Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti M. Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Jun; 64(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 16809190 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of solvent type in experimental dentin primer on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations. Balkenhol M, Huang J, Wöstmann B, Hannig M. J Dent; 2007 Nov; 35(11):836-44. PubMed ID: 17905507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Sealing ability of occlusal resin composite restoration using four restorative procedures. Banomyong D, Palamara JE, Messer HH, Burrow MF. Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 19049529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years. Krämer N, Reinelt C, Richter G, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 19237189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of dentin cavity surface finishing on micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives. Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Ermis RB, Poitevin A, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Carvalho RC, Van Meerbeek B. Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):492-501. PubMed ID: 17675225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of photoactivation systems and resin composites on the microleakage of esthetic restorations. Cavalcante LM, Peris AR, Ambrosano GM, Ritter AV, Pimenta LA. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb 01; 8(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 17277829 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement. Xie H, Zhang F, Wu Y, Chen C, Liu W. Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec 01; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers--comparison with SEM quantitative analysis. Heintze S, Forjanic M, Cavalleri A. J Adhes Dent; 2008 Aug 01; 10(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 18792696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]