These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

148 related items for PubMed ID: 17679958

  • 1. [The use of magnetic resonance contrast agents for selective digital subtraction angiography and computed tomography with contrast enhancement].
    Kokov LS, Karmazanovskiĭ GG, Likharev AY, Shimanovskiĭ NL.
    Angiol Sosud Khir; 2006; 12(4):51-8. PubMed ID: 17679958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Gadolinium in arteriography and interventional radiology: 39 patients].
    Robert A, Bonneville F, Miralbes S, Huart JY, Cattin F, Quantin N, Bonneville JF.
    J Radiol; 2002 Nov; 83(11):1759-63. PubMed ID: 12469013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The use of gadolinium chelates for X-ray digital subtraction angiography.
    Wagner HJ, Kalinowski M, Klose KJ, Alfke H.
    Invest Radiol; 2001 May; 36(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 11323513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. X-ray digital subtraction angiography with 1 mol/L gadobutrol: results from a comparative porcine study With iodinated contrast agents.
    Kalinowski M, Kress O, Wels T, Alfke H, Klose KJ, Wagner HJ.
    Invest Radiol; 2002 May; 37(5):254-62. PubMed ID: 11979151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
    Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Duyme M, Sahel M, Zouaoui A, Marsault C.
    Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cervical CT angiography comparing routine noncontrast and a late venous scan as masks for automated bone subtraction: feasibility study and examination of the influence of patient motion on image quality.
    Lell MM, Ditt H, Panknin C, Sayre JW, Klotz E, Ruehm SG, Villablanca JP.
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jan; 43(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 18097274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Gadolinium-based contrast media compared with iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in azotaemic patients.
    Erley CM, Bader BD, Berger ED, Tuncel N, Winkler S, Tepe G, Risler T, Duda S.
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2004 Oct; 19(10):2526-31. PubMed ID: 15280530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Computed radiography angiography using storage phosphor imaging plates: eight year's experience.
    Kudo S, Kato A, Uchino A, Matsuo Y, Mizuguchi M, Fukahori T, Matsumoto K, Shimizu T.
    Radiat Med; 1997 Oct; 15(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 9278369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinically useful dilution factors for iodine and gadolinium contrast material: an animal model of pediatric digital subtraction angiography using state-of-the-art flat-panel detectors.
    Racadio JM, Kashinkunti SR, Nachabe RA, Racadio JM, Johnson ND, Kukreja KU, Patel MN, Privitera MB, Hales JE, Abruzzo TA.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1491-501. PubMed ID: 23736781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.