These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
646 related items for PubMed ID: 17680226
1. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm]. Treutwein M, Bogner L. Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements. Edimo P, Clermont C, Kwato MG, Vynckier S. Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm. Ding GX, Cygler JE, Yu CW, Kalach NI, Daskalov G. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct 01; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems. Paelinck L, Reynaert N, Thierens H, De Neve W, De Wagter C. Phys Med Biol; 2005 May 07; 50(9):2055-69. PubMed ID: 15843736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Verification and application of the voxel-based Monte Carlo (VMC++) electron dose module of Oncentra MasterPlan]. Scherf C, Scherer J, Bogner L. Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Feb 07; 183(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 17294112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations. Fogliata A, Vanetti E, Albers D, Brink C, Clivio A, Knöös T, Nicolini G, Cozzi L. Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar 07; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm. Newhauser W, Fontenot J, Zheng Y, Polf J, Titt U, Koch N, Zhang X, Mohan R. Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug 07; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy. Paganetti H, Jiang H, Parodi K, Slopsema R, Engelsman M. Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep 07; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases. Hasenbalg F, Neuenschwander H, Mini R, Born EJ. Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul 07; 52(13):3679-91. PubMed ID: 17664570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. Panettieri V, Barsoum P, Westermark M, Brualla L, Lax I. Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct 07; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems. Panettieri V, Wennberg B, Gagliardi G, Duch MA, Ginjaume M, Lax I. Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul 21; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams. Fotina I, Winkler P, Künzler T, Reiterer J, Simmat I, Georg D. Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec 21; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam. Koelbl O, Krieger T, Haedinger U, Sauer O, Flentje M. Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Dec 21; 180(12):783-8. PubMed ID: 15592698 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Experimental validation of a Monte Carlo-based treatment-planning system for electron beams]. Mika S, Christ G. Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Mar 21; 183(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 17340074 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations. Vanderstraeten B, Reynaert N, Paelinck L, Madani I, De Wagter C, De Gersem W, De Neve W, Thierens H. Med Phys; 2006 Sep 21; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams). Blazy L, Baltes D, Bordy JM, Cutarella D, Delaunay F, Gouriou J, Leroy E, Ostrowsky A, Beaumont S. Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov 21; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A deterministic partial differential equation model for dose calculation in electron radiotherapy. Duclous R, Dubroca B, Frank M. Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul 07; 55(13):3843-57. PubMed ID: 20571208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of electron beam obliquity on lateral buildup ratio: a Monte Carlo dosimetry evaluation. Chow JC, Grigorov GN. Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul 07; 52(13):3965-77. PubMed ID: 17664588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: implications for tumour coverage. Aarup LR, Nahum AE, Zacharatou C, Juhler-Nøttrup T, Knöös T, Nyström H, Specht L, Wieslander E, Korreman SS. Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun 07; 91(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 19297051 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional inserts and an add-on electron MLC for chest wall irradiation of left-sided breast cancer. Vatanen T, Traneus E, Lahtinen T. Acta Oncol; 2009 Jun 07; 48(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 18932098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]