These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

132 related items for PubMed ID: 17694739

  • 21. Tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impressions bonded to a custom tray as a function of drying time: Part I.
    Cho GC, Donovan TE, Chee WW, White SN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 May; 73(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 7658389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The bond strength of different tray adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane to two tray materials: an in vitro study.
    Ashwini BL, Manjunath S, Mathew KX.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Mar; 14(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 24604995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Universal Tray Adhesives on Silicone Impression Materials Using an Acrylic Tray.
    Kambiranda SC, Pinto B, Elpatal MA, Sam G, Chaitra AS, Rani RP.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Dec 01; 20(12):1406-1411. PubMed ID: 32381841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [The bonding properties of various silicone impression materials at standardized surfaces using adhesives].
    Morneburg T.
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991 Dec 01; 41(8):306-8. PubMed ID: 1816858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics.
    Ciesco JN, Malone WF, Sandrik JL, Mazur B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jan 01; 45(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7007629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Adhesion between copper-plated acrylic tray resin and a polysulfide rubber impression material.
    Shigeto N, Kawazoe Y, Hamada T, Yamada S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Aug 01; 42(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 379322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Retention strength of impression materials to a tray material using different adhesive methods: an in vitro study.
    Marafie Y, Looney S, Nelson S, Chan D, Browning W, Rueggeberg F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec 01; 100(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 19033027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S, Zaree Z, Mosharraf R.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep 01; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Effect of reactive adhesives on the tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to methyl methacrylate tray material.
    Ona M, Takahashi H, Sato M, Igarashi Y, Wakabayashi N.
    Dent Mater J; 2010 May 01; 29(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 20484844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.