These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

173 related items for PubMed ID: 17695617

  • 1. The ethics of enabling technology.
    Hansson SO.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):257-67. PubMed ID: 17695617
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. QALY: an ethical issue that dare not speak its name.
    Hirskyj P.
    Nurs Ethics; 2007 Jan; 14(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 17334172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. You cannot have your normal functioning cake and eat it too.
    Loi M.
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):748-51. PubMed ID: 23349511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mapping community concerns about radical extensions of human life expectancy.
    Partridge B, Hall W, Lucke J, Underwood M, Bartlett H.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):W4-5. PubMed ID: 20013485
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The good news about managed care organizations.
    Silva MC, Bulla S, Kordick MF.
    Nurs Manage; 2006 May; 37(5):18. PubMed ID: 16651897
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Children with severe and profound disabilities and the issue of social justice.
    Savage TA.
    Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1998 May; 4(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 9874951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Design and engineering ethics considerations for neurotechnologies.
    Van der Loos HF.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007 May; 16(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 17695621
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The significance of the concept of disease for justice in health care.
    Schramme T.
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2007 May; 28(2):121-35. PubMed ID: 17516147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Well-being and fairness in the distribution of scarce health resources.
    Segev R.
    J Med Philos; 2005 Jun; 30(3):231-60. PubMed ID: 16036458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Bioethics: private choice and common good.
    Callahan D.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1994 Jun; 24(3):28-31. PubMed ID: 8089005
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The Art of Misunderstanding Critics.
    Hauskeller M.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2016 Jan; 25(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 26788955
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Organizational needs versus ethics committee practice.
    Magnus D.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 19326297
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Biomedical enhancements as justice.
    Nam J.
    Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 24117708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Resolution of the DVfR members on implementation of the UN Disability Rights Convention].
    Deutsche Vereinigung für Rehabilitation e. V.1.
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2010 Dec; 49(6):402. PubMed ID: 21140326
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Striving for perfection: can we go too far?
    Meyer KR.
    J Christ Nurs; 2007 Dec; 24(4):206-11. PubMed ID: 17955672
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don't like it and why maybe we should.
    Buyx AM.
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Dec; 34(12):871-4. PubMed ID: 19043112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Administrative gatekeeping - a third way between unrestricted patient advocacy and bedside rationing.
    Lauridsen S.
    Bioethics; 2009 Jun; 23(5):311-20. PubMed ID: 18410460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.